snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > Crash and Burn

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27 October 2017, 06:54 PM
E. Q. Taft's Avatar
E. Q. Taft E. Q. Taft is offline
 
Join Date: 30 July 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,194
Goldfish Sharks and Lost Hope: 2 Women Rescued After 5 Months at Sea

The planned voyage from Hawaii to Tahiti aboard a 50-foot sailboat didn't start off well for two Honolulu women. One of their cellphones was washed overboard and sank to the bottom on their first day at sea.

From there, things got worse. Much worse.

But the two sailors, accompanied by their dogs, were resourceful and well-prepared with more than a year's worth of food, and on Wednesday they were finally rescued by the U.S. Navy about 900 miles off Japan and thousands of miles from their destination.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27 October 2017, 07:23 PM
jimmy101_again jimmy101_again is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2005
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 6,906
Default

No link?

I don't understand what their problem(s) were. Cell phones don't work at sea anyway. They are on a sailboat and they don't need a working motor. (A motor is nice but 50' sailboats really aren't designed to travel long distances on their motors.) Even without any electronics they can still just sail in a particular direction and they'll hit land eventually. There must be a lot of missing info in the news reports.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/us/wom...rnd/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27 October 2017, 08:04 PM
E. Q. Taft's Avatar
E. Q. Taft E. Q. Taft is offline
 
Join Date: 30 July 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,194
Default

Gah! Sorry.. This is the story I was referring to, but it's all over various news sites:

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/artic...m-bad-to-worse
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27 October 2017, 08:35 PM
Beachlife!'s Avatar
Beachlife! Beachlife! is offline
 
Join Date: 22 June 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 28,534
Default

There's got to be more to the story. As written, it doesn't make them seem resourceful at all. Are sharks really a danger when you are in a 50 foot sailing vessel? I can understand it would have been a different story in a life raft.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27 October 2017, 08:55 PM
WildaBeast's Avatar
WildaBeast WildaBeast is offline
 
Join Date: 18 July 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 15,594
Default

I suppose the get some credit for carrying a year's worth of food on a voyage they expected to take less than two months, although I wouldn't be surprised if that's standard practice for a long sailing trip like that. I don't know if that counts as "resourceful" though, or just good planning. It seems when sailing across the open ocean it would be wise to have a satellite phone, or at least a longer range radio transmitter than what they had.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27 October 2017, 09:35 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is offline
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy101_again View Post
I don't understand what their problem(s) were. Cell phones don't work at sea anyway. They are on a sailboat and they don't need a working motor. (A motor is nice but 50' sailboats really aren't designed to travel long distances on their motors.) Even without any electronics they can still just sail in a particular direction and they'll hit land eventually.
There is. The first thing that happened was the mast spreader broke early on.

For those that don't know sailing, that's part of the standing rigging* that keeps the shrouds** in place to help prevent side loads from tearing the mast out of the ship. Without those, it would have been dangerous to sail close*** or even beam reach**** in a strong breeze. Sailing like that puts a great deal of side-strain on the mast as the force of the wind is trying to tip the vessel over. Sailing that way without the full system of rigging could have ripped the mast from the hull, potentially opening up a huge hole in it. That concern would have limited them to broad reach or running*****. Saling like that puts lesser strain on the boat and that strain is fore-aft, where (presumably) the backstay****** was still working. The trade winds******* around Hawaii tend to be from the east or north-east so running /reaching before the wind would limit them to heading in westerly directions. They were found about 950 miles south east of Japan, so it sounds like the headed in the safest direction and figured they'd hit land eventually.

* The cables and lines that are fixed in place. Pretty much like the diagonal guy wires for a telephone pole on the sea.
** The lines from the top of the mast to the sides of the ship.
*** When the wind is coming over the bow (front) of the ship.
**** When the wind is coming over the side (side) of the ship.
***** When the wind is coming over the stern (back) of the ship.
****** The rigging running from the mast to the stern (back) of the ship. Its job is to strengthen the mast in forward loads.
******* Winds on the oceans tend to be very consistent. When trade was carried by sailing ships, they relied upon these trade winds to keep on their routes.

ETA: tl;dr: IMBLO********, the strength of their mast was compromised because of previous damage and sailing west was the safest thing they could do.

******** Barely Learned
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28 October 2017, 07:05 PM
jimmy101_again jimmy101_again is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2005
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 6,906
Default

Ah, what Genyus posted makes more sense. The reports I've seen all basically harped on loosing the cell phone (which is stupid) and the motor failing (which is also stupid on a sailboat, nobody intends to move a 50' sailboat thousands of miles on its motor).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31 October 2017, 12:26 PM
Psihala's Avatar
Psihala Psihala is offline
 
Join Date: 28 February 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 8,017
Ponder Sailors Rescued After Months at Sea Didnít Activate Emergency Beacon

The U.S. Coast Guard said Monday that the two Hawaii women who were lost at sea for five months had an emergency beacon aboard their sailboat that was never activated.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...beacon-n815876
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31 October 2017, 01:42 PM
Sooeygun Sooeygun is offline
 
Join Date: 30 May 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,140
Default Inconsistencies cast story of sailors rescued after 5 months at sea into doubt

Parts of their story have been called into question, including the tropical storm the two say they encountered on their first night at sea in May. National Weather Service records show no organized storms in the region in early May.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/lost-at...dogs-1.4379649

Some of this is the same as Psihala's link (probably same AP source), but different details.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31 October 2017, 02:07 PM
ChasFink's Avatar
ChasFink ChasFink is offline
 
Join Date: 09 December 2015
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 841
Icon05

I'm very confused. Why would anyone make up a story like this?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31 October 2017, 02:39 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is online now
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 74,430
Default

Off the top of my head, to get a book deal. To get attention, more generally.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31 October 2017, 02:55 PM
ChasFink's Avatar
ChasFink ChasFink is offline
 
Join Date: 09 December 2015
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 841
Default

I guess some people have more free time than me for attracting attention to themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31 October 2017, 03:10 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is offline
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,108
Default

The multiple times they thought a harbor wouldn't accommodate them are particularly odd. I'm not sure what model sailboat that is, but 15 meters sailboats typically have drafts between 5 and 8 feet. Anything that is a harbor is going to be able to accommodate a vessel of that size. Even if they couldn't dock or find anchorage, they certainly could have gotten close enough that their signals could have been detected.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31 October 2017, 03:26 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is online now
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 74,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChasFink View Post
I guess some people have more free time than me for attracting attention to themselves.
And more interest in doing so, probably.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31 October 2017, 04:19 PM
Beachlife!'s Avatar
Beachlife! Beachlife! is offline
 
Join Date: 22 June 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 28,534
Default

I can't even figure out what they were talking about when they said in a press conference that had they not been found they would have been dead in 24 hours. Of what?!?

It seems to me that they had no idea what they were doing and tried to cover up their embarrassment with manufactured drama.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31 October 2017, 05:46 PM
Dr. Dave Dr. Dave is offline
 
Join Date: 28 June 2005
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 5,279
Icon605

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lainie View Post
Off the top of my head, to get a book deal. To get attention, more generally.
I was thinking TV series or movie deal, but yeah.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31 October 2017, 05:48 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is online now
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 74,430
Default

As for free time, their original plan suggests they had a lot more of it than most of us do.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31 October 2017, 07:32 PM
jimmy101_again jimmy101_again is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2005
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 6,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChasFink View Post
I guess some people have more free time than me for attracting attention to themselves.
People that go on planned weeks or months long sailboat voyages probably have more free time than you (or I) do.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31 October 2017, 07:55 PM
UEL's Avatar
UEL UEL is offline
 
Join Date: 01 August 2004
Location: Fredericton, Canada
Posts: 9,259
Baseball

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenYus234 View Post
The multiple times they thought a harbor wouldn't accommodate them are particularly odd. I'm not sure what model sailboat that is, but 15 meters sailboats typically have drafts between 5 and 8 feet. Anything that is a harbor is going to be able to accommodate a vessel of that size. Even if they couldn't dock or find anchorage, they certainly could have gotten close enough that their signals could have been detected.
I've read quite a bit about it and have plotted everything on Google Earth. Very interesting.

They claim to have talked to someone on Wake Island, but that person would only help them if they sailed to the south side of the island. Instead, they preferred to sail westwards.

Their claim that their boat was too big rests on the fact that the owner added 6 tonnes of fibreglass to the hull to strengthen it (but shark attacks were tsill an issue, I guess) gave it an 8.5 draft. That is too deep. She also claimed that the 50 foot length made it too long to manoeuvre in the harbours. So, they'd sail a thousand more miles to get to a better harbour.

They also claim that their "antenna" was damaged, so all six of their communications devices failed. I work with all sorts of communications devices (HF, VHF, UHF, Microwave, satellite, cellular etc) and they all have different parameters for antenna. Now, if she said that the part of the superstructure that held all her antennae (or with an s if you prefer) was swept overboard, I'd be more inclined to offer the benefit of the doubt. But in an interview, she claimed that their comms was compromised because the damaged antenna would not allow for any signal from any device.

I was dubious of the less than 24 hours left to live claim until I read about how the Taiwanese fishing vessel attempt at rescue. Apparently, the damage from that vessel made their craft very unseaworthy. They have the benefit of my doubt on that one.

All told, I suspect that they may have conflated a few small problems into a much bigger one in order to have 15 minutes of fame.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 31 October 2017, 08:02 PM
jimmy101_again jimmy101_again is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2005
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 6,906
Default

Snopes has and article outline the major inconsistencies and other odd features of the story.
https://www.snopes.com/2017/10/31/hawaii-rescue/
It appears they passed multiple harbors for which a 9 foot draft would not have been a problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sharks Do Get Cancer snopes Critter Country 2 12 December 2013 04:33 AM
3 'slave' women rescued after 30 years of captivity in London house Simply Madeline Police Blotter 1 21 November 2013 09:22 PM
Family That Left US in Sailboat Over Religious Freedom Was Lost at Sea for Months Simply Madeline Soapbox Derby 29 13 August 2013 02:32 PM
Did sharks follow slave ships? DawnStorm History 34 26 July 2013 09:42 PM
Myth-breaking time: Sharks bite but don't target humans snopes Critter Country 24 16 March 2007 10:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.