snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07 January 2007, 08:19 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 75,151
Cheer Catherine Bell predicted Super Bowl XXXVI details

Comment: The JAG actress Catherine Bell supposedly correctly predicted the teams (New England and St. Louis) and final score (20-17) of Super Bowl XXXVI before the season even began. The prediction was in The Sporting News magazine. Did she really make such a prediction?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07 January 2007, 08:27 AM
DAnnino's Avatar
DAnnino DAnnino is offline
 
Join Date: 01 September 2005
Location: Southeastern Arizona
Posts: 1,929
Police

This is apparently true, according to the IMDB catherine Bell page.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004738/bio

Quote:
Before the 2001 NFL season began, in a survey of 70 celebrities who had nothing to do with football conducted by "The Sporting News," she correctly predicted that the New England Patriots would eventually beat the St. Louis Rams in the season-ending Super Bowl by the score of 20 to 17. This amazing prediction was made despite the fact that vast majority of "football experts" didn't think the Patriots would even make the playoffs much less get to the Super Bowl. She's the only person to have ever correctly predicted the participants in, winner, and final score of a Super Bowl before a season began in a published article in a major sports periodical or book.
Knows football, and she's smokin' hot, too!
__________________
No better friend, no worse enemy
-----
I grok that when apes learn to laugh, they'll be people.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07 January 2007, 01:26 PM
Mr. Furious's Avatar
Mr. Furious Mr. Furious is offline
 
Join Date: 13 January 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,658
Default

IMDb is notorious for ULs and other unverified information. I'd like to see the actual TSN issue before I'd consider it confirmed.
__________________
Facebook Profile
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07 January 2007, 04:53 PM
Johnny Slick's Avatar
Johnny Slick Johnny Slick is offline
 
Join Date: 13 February 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,915
Default

Even if true, enough monkeys at enough typewriters...
__________________
Okay, this was aWesome. Can I sig this? - Johnny Slick
My (new) blog: http://johnnyslick.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08 January 2007, 08:45 AM
DAnnino's Avatar
DAnnino DAnnino is offline
 
Join Date: 01 September 2005
Location: Southeastern Arizona
Posts: 1,929
Police

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Slick View Post
Even if true, enough monkeys at enough typewriters...
That's pretty much probably it.

Last spring, a woman who knew nothing about sports won our NCAA March Madness pool, based on picking teams with cute animal mascots and school colors.
__________________
No better friend, no worse enemy
-----
I grok that when apes learn to laugh, they'll be people.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08 January 2007, 04:25 PM
Gibbie's Avatar
Gibbie Gibbie is offline
 
Join Date: 20 February 2000
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 6,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAnnino View Post
That's pretty much probably it.

Last spring, a woman who knew nothing about sports won our NCAA March Madness pool, based on picking teams with cute animal mascots and school colors.
Unless of course, that was just her ruse to sucker y'all in. Looks like it worked.

Gibbie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09 January 2007, 02:53 PM
hoitoider's Avatar
hoitoider hoitoider is offline
 
Join Date: 22 October 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 4,943
Teacher

This stuff is pretty funny. It's like when someone wins the lottery b/c of their amazing skill at being able to pick six random numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09 January 2007, 04:35 PM
Meka Meka is offline
 
 
Join Date: 20 December 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Slick View Post
Even if true, enough monkeys at enough typewriters...
Are you familiar with espn.com's Tuesday Morning Quarterback? One of the column's long running themes has been the futility of using "insider information" or "in depth analysis" in trying to predict scores. The columnist cited the Catherine Bell pick as an example.

He also tracked the predictions made by the New York Times, which of course included breakdowns of every game. Over several years and something like a thousand predictions, they were right less than 5 times (2 or 3 times, if I recall). A generic prediction of "Home Team wins, 20-17" (historically, a common outcome) would have yielded better results.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14 January 2007, 05:09 PM
forcadragons's Avatar
forcadragons forcadragons is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2006
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 480
Default

IIRC, Tuesday Morning Quarterback pointed out that many celebrities were asked to predict the score of the Super Bowl AFTER tehe participants were known, and only Catherine Bell got it correct.
__________________
Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14 January 2007, 05:13 PM
forcadragons's Avatar
forcadragons forcadragons is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2006
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forcadragons View Post
IIRC, Tuesday Morning Quarterback pointed out that many celebrities were asked to predict the score of the Super Bowl AFTER tehe participants were known, and only Catherine Bell got it correct.
Found it!
http://archive.sportingnews.com/nfl/...31/379058.html
__________________
Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15 January 2007, 07:30 AM
DAnnino's Avatar
DAnnino DAnnino is offline
 
Join Date: 01 September 2005
Location: Southeastern Arizona
Posts: 1,929
Police

Quote:
Originally Posted by forcadragons View Post
I tried to dig around the site, but I couldn't find it.

Yeah, they knew who was playing, but she was the only one who go the score right. I'm sure it was SWAG (silly wild-a$$ guess).

And I loved Shatner's non-answer.
__________________
No better friend, no worse enemy
-----
I grok that when apes learn to laugh, they'll be people.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29 January 2008, 09:32 AM
DAnnino's Avatar
DAnnino DAnnino is offline
 
Join Date: 01 September 2005
Location: Southeastern Arizona
Posts: 1,929
Police

I noticed that Snopes put this legend on the home page. Just out of curiosity, I went to check back at IMDb, and they fixed the item in her bio:

Quote:
Correctly predicted the winner and final score of Super Bowl XXXVI, in a survey of 70 celebrities who had nothing to do with football conducted by The Sporting News. Specifically, she correctly predicted that the New England Patriots would beat the St. Louis Rams by a score of 20-17. (She is incorrectly rumored to have made this prediction before the season began; in fact, she made it after after both teams had already won their respective conference championships.).
Who says Snopes doesn't influence anyone?
__________________
No better friend, no worse enemy
-----
I grok that when apes learn to laugh, they'll be people.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.