snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Spook Central

View Poll Results: How many shooters:
1 109 81.95%
2 20 15.04%
more than 2 4 3.01%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:11 PM
Ravenhull's Avatar
Ravenhull Ravenhull is offline
 
Join Date: 13 September 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 1,903
Ambulance JFK Assassination opinion poll

Well, it's been nearly 43 years since it happens and everybody still has an opinion. Well, lets see what the folks around here think.
__________________
"Real patriots ask questions" -- Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan; The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:13 PM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: Ipswich, UK
Posts: 15,280
Default

Wahey! 100% of the sample of 1 agrees with my vote!

(eta) No option for "none"? The conspiracy theorists aren't trying...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:19 PM
Ravenhull's Avatar
Ravenhull Ravenhull is offline
 
Join Date: 13 September 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 1,903
Icon401

Oooookay, for some reason I thought I could make a poll with multiple questions... and now I don't know how to fix this.

Other questions would have been:

2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? (Yes/probably/probably not/true patsy)

3) How many were directly involved? (1/2-5/5-20/20+)

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? (Yes/Probably/Probably Not/No)

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? (Yes/Probably/Probably Not/No)


And as for my answers:

1) 2
2) Yes, but not neccessarily a shooter
3) 2-5 (More than that would have probably had a leak by now)
4) No
5) Probably not. While I trust Hoover and company about as far as I can throw his casket, it wasn't his style.
__________________
"Real patriots ask questions" -- Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan; The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:20 PM
JoeBentley's Avatar
JoeBentley JoeBentley is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2002
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 13,923
Default

I put JFK conspiracy theorist in the same category as 9/11 conspiracy theorist and moon landing hoaxers, using government paranoia to create some sort of impossibly complicated scheme that would require way too many people to keep quiet for far too long.
__________________
I realized how bad it was when I looked back on my life and sadly realized the most skepticism oriented show ever to hit the mainstream was Scooby Doo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:22 PM
JoeBentley's Avatar
JoeBentley JoeBentley is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2002
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 13,923
Default

2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? 1

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? Yes. The so called "Magic Bullet" actually traveled in a perfectly straight line.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? No
__________________
I realized how bad it was when I looked back on my life and sadly realized the most skepticism oriented show ever to hit the mainstream was Scooby Doo.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:31 PM
Ravenhull's Avatar
Ravenhull Ravenhull is offline
 
Join Date: 13 September 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 1,903
Soapbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
I put JFK conspiracy theorist in the same category as 9/11 conspiracy theorist and moon landing hoaxers, using government paranoia to create some sort of impossibly complicated scheme that would require way too many people to keep quiet for far too long.
Well, I don't believe there was any goverment action involved in this beyond a possible 'we need to get this settled as quick as possible.' And even that is doubtfull.

I just have my doubts about the official 'number of shots fired' and 'direction of impacts.'

And while the Zegruter (I know I mangled that) film is not perfect, I have trouble with the fact that the President is able to raise his hands up to his neck for a number of frames while the Govenor is able to continue to wave his hat with the wrist that was impacted. It just doesn't feel right.

As for 9/11, a bunch of islamic radicals succeeded in a plot that was beyond what we expected and murdered thousands. Our government was not involved in any way. That is my opinion.

The truest truth is, I doubt we are ever going to see a clearer resolution to the JFK issue. A combination of factors have left us with very muddy water.
__________________
"Real patriots ask questions" -- Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan; The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:35 PM
Christie Christie is offline
 
Join Date: 28 November 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 28,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
I put JFK conspiracy theorist in the same category as 9/11 conspiracy theorist and moon landing hoaxers, using government paranoia to create some sort of impossibly complicated scheme that would require way too many people to keep quiet for far too long.
Same with the Princess Diana "Philip told them to do it" conspiracy. These all seem to rely on the ability of an awful lot of people being able to keep a secret. Aside from the paranoia and general goofiness of most of these theories anyway, this is the main reason I think they're fantasy.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:46 PM
MacLloyd's Avatar
MacLloyd MacLloyd is offline
 
Join Date: 02 July 2005
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 1,423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? 1

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? Yes. The so called "Magic Bullet" actually traveled in a perfectly straight line.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? No
That was easier than typing it all in myself. Which of course means I think there was only one shooter.

When I was much younger I was sure that there was a conspiracy, probably because that is so much cooler, but after much research and reading I am firmly convinced that Oswald acted alone.

Mac"boring, but much more likely"Lloyd
__________________
Sometimes with secret pride I sigh To think how tolerant am I; Then I wonder which is really mine: Tolerance or a rubber spine? -- Ogden Nash
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:50 PM
Christie Christie is offline
 
Join Date: 28 November 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 28,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? 1

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? Yes. The so called "Magic Bullet" actually traveled in a perfectly straight line.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? No
Ditto on all points.

As MacLloyd says, it's not as cool - but I believe it's right.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09 May 2007, 12:55 PM
Paulie Jay
 
Posts: n/a
Default

2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? Impossible to know, but probably just the one.

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? Yes - if we're talking magic bullet.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? Probably not.

For many years when I was younger I swallowed the entire conspiracy hook, line and sinker. Every crackpot with an unchecked story to tell, every appeal to ignorance, every piece of made up "evidence" - I simply believed it all. It was a long and painful process of discovery through websites such as McAdams that shook me out of my stupor. Rather embarrassed by it all these days...

Last edited by Paulie Jay; 09 May 2007 at 12:56 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09 May 2007, 01:07 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is offline
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 28,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenhull View Post
And while the Zegruter (I know I mangled that) . . .
Zapruder.

I don't buy the conspiracy theories either.
__________________
I just don't want to date an older woman. They look at love with a jaundiced eye. I can jaundice a woman on my own, I don't need her to be pre-jaundiced. -- Garrison Keillor, as Guy Noir
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09 May 2007, 02:10 PM
stalker stalker is offline
 
Join Date: 10 July 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,133
Police

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? 1

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? Yes. The so called "Magic Bullet" actually traveled in a perfectly straight line.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? No
May I be another of the "just copy JoeBentley's post" group.

Years ago I thought that maybe there was a possibility of a conspiracy. The previous attempted killing of General Walker, the attempted defection to Russia and the general mentalist behaviour swung me back to reality.

I now believe that Red Dwarf, Tikka to Ride puts forward the most convincing conspiracy theory, though.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09 May 2007, 02:39 PM
Singing in the Drizzle Singing in the Drizzle is offline
 
Join Date: 24 November 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,241
Default

2) Was Lee Harvey Oswald directly involved? Yes

3) How many were directly involved? Only the one. It is possible that some people could knownely helped Lee Harvey Oswald achieve his goal.

4) Did one bullet hit both the President and Govenor Conally? I could see that the bullet traveled in a straight line at the age of 12 and just from watching the video. The car did not have normal seat placement and they both were not sitting straight up in there seat looking forward.

5) Was there any direct involvement by senior elements of the US Government? Probably not.

If there was a conspiracy. It was a small group that work thru LHO to achieve there goal. The found the right person and let them do all most all the work and they helped were needed in small ways.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09 May 2007, 02:45 PM
Note to Self
 
Posts: n/a
Default

...I only voted "more than two" to be the first statistic that voted it! YEY FOR ME!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:02 PM
Troberg's Avatar
Troberg Troberg is offline
 
 
Join Date: 04 November 2005
Location: Borlänge, Sweden
Posts: 9,234
Default

Well, any theory that does not contain at least Elvis, aliens and Nixon can't be trusted.

To me, it's clear that it was one shooter, and it was probably Oswald. Who put him up to it is a different matter, here is almost no real information there.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:03 PM
AnglRdr's Avatar
AnglRdr AnglRdr is offline
 
Join Date: 06 June 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 35,336
Default

One shooter, many conspirarists, perhaps some low-level civil servants but no "government conspiracy," as such.

And there was definintely more than one bullet.
__________________
Not everyone has the time or energy to end 21st century slavery, but everyone can let the yellow mellow.--rhiandmoi
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:04 PM
JoeBentley's Avatar
JoeBentley JoeBentley is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2002
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 13,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christie View Post
Ditto on all points.

As MacLloyd says, it's not as cool - but I believe it's right.
I know I keep going back to this show but dammit I agree with it a lot.

On the oft quoted (well by me anyway) Conspiracy Theory episode of Penn and Teller's Bullshit a guest asked "Do you honestly think that Oswald just woke up one morning and decided he was going to shoot the President?"

To which Penn replied "Yes, but that's just not a very sexy answer."
__________________
I realized how bad it was when I looked back on my life and sadly realized the most skepticism oriented show ever to hit the mainstream was Scooby Doo.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:07 PM
JoeBentley's Avatar
JoeBentley JoeBentley is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2002
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 13,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnglRdr View Post
And there was definintely more than one bullet.
Do you mean more then one bullet fired or more then one bullet causing the injuries in Governer Connally's wrist and chest and the injury to Kennedy's neck?

Oswald fire three shots, one missed, one caused the wounds in Governor Connally and President Kennedy's neck, and the third was the shot to the back Kennedy's head.
__________________
I realized how bad it was when I looked back on my life and sadly realized the most skepticism oriented show ever to hit the mainstream was Scooby Doo.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:35 PM
chillas's Avatar
chillas chillas is offline
 
Join Date: 09 September 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 8,393
Default

Not to "me too" here, but, welll ... me too (to JoeBentley's post).

To address (extremely briefly) the so-called "magic bullet" - the first wound to Kennery is misplace by the conspiracy nuts based on the damage to his jacket. What they don't take into account is the fact that the jacket was bunched up due to Kennedy having his arm raised and the back brace he was wearing. Keeping that in mind, as well as the different elevations of the seats in the car, the bullet clearly travelled in a straight line through Kennendy, through Connally, into his wrist, took a very slight deflection off the wrist bone (the first non-soft tissue it hit to this point) and into his thigh. There was nothing magic about it.
__________________
Come on, come on, spin a little tighter / Come on, come on, and the world's a little brighter ~ Accidentally in Love, Counting Crows
Chuck Jones is a vengeful god
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09 May 2007, 03:36 PM
I'mNotDedalus's Avatar
I'mNotDedalus I'mNotDedalus is offline
 
Join Date: 09 February 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,670
Default

I think the case was handled rather poorly by the Dallas Police and FBI (muddled further by the CIA's lack of forthright cooperation). More so, I think we may still learn relevant information about Oswald when the file is declassified in years to come--particularly concerning his defection to the USSR and subsequent return to the US.

Nevertheless, the more I look at the evidence, the more I'm inclined to think he probably acted alone, fueled by madness. Ample computer diagrams illustrate the physics of the "magic bullet" to my satisfaction. Abundant documentary evidence disproves that Kennedy wanted to tone down the Vietnam War (a war in which he escalated after Eisenhower's departure)--the most common explanation for why a government conspiracy existed. In simplicity, I'm especially taken by an account Oswald's brother relates, who visited him in his Dallas cell, stating that he was beaming and grinning all the while.
__________________
The salty fragrance of L’Eau D’I’mNotDedalus - made entirely of and entirely for sea turtles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.