snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Fauxtography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 23 July 2011, 07:36 PM
Bonnie's Avatar
Bonnie Bonnie is offline
 
Join Date: 01 January 1970
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 109
Vanishing

Tangen, Murphy, and Thompson just published an article on this effect in Perception (40: 628-630, 2011).

They report that

Quote:
We standardised the presentation rate and found that roughly 4-5 faces per second was ideal [for producing the effect]. After gazing at a continuous sequence for a minute or so, many of the faces will appear highly distorted, even monstrous. The degree of distortion is greatest for faces that deviate from the others in the set on a particular dimension. If one face has an especially large or pronounced forehead compared to the others in the set, for example, then it appears particularly bulbous.

Relative encoding seems to drive the effect. That is, forcing the observer to encode each face in light of the others. By [the investigators'] eye-aligning the faces, it becomes much easier [for the observer] to compare their shape and the relative location of their features, so the differences between them become more evident. The fast, steady presentation rate may also encourage this relative encoding. If the faces are not eye-aligned or if they are presented too slowly or quickly, then the effect lessens. Or, if we insert a brief gap in the sequence, the effect almost completely disappears.
-- Bonnie
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23 July 2011, 08:06 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is online now
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 60,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Singing in the Drizzle View Post
I would say it has more to do with peripheral vision and how the eye processes that information.
I saw little to no distortion, and I test well for peripheral vision.

OTOH, that depth perception test where you have to identify which of a group of dots stands out from the background? I'm really bad at that.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 24 July 2011, 10:18 PM
TrishDaDish's Avatar
TrishDaDish TrishDaDish is offline
 
Join Date: 22 February 2004
Location: Portsmouth, RI
Posts: 7,605
Default

While you're tripping out, why not make your eyes think you're underwater?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01 August 2011, 10:03 PM
Diabolus Ex Deus's Avatar
Diabolus Ex Deus Diabolus Ex Deus is offline
 
Join Date: 19 August 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 113
Default

I really couldn't see much other than some skin-tone mixing, but my co-worker was floored by the effect. Really interesting how that is.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 15 September 2011, 10:46 PM
jayjaybear jayjaybear is offline
 
 
Join Date: 07 February 2004
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrishDaDish View Post
That was just...disturbing. It looked like everything was BREATHING!

As far as the original optical illusion, I thought quite a few of those faces ended up looking like the Forsaken in World of Warcraft.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 16 September 2011, 12:11 AM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is online now
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,999
Default

I watched it through following the instructions, focusing on the cross in the middle. Then I watched it once more covering the left face with my hand and looking directly at the right one; and again covering the right face and looking directly at the left one.

I got the exact same effect all three times: as the faces changed from one face to the next, there was a distortion effect during the change; for the moment inbetween, the faces looked normal. Unless there's something there I didn't see at all (which is certainly possible), it's got nothing to do with seeing two faces at once, or with peripheral vision; it's got to do with the rapid change from one face to another.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 16 September 2011, 01:23 AM
RivkahChaya's Avatar
RivkahChaya RivkahChaya is offline
 
Join Date: 14 July 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,278
Default

Even if you watch just one side, with both eyes, it looks cartoonish, although if you stop it, you see a normal face-- a photo, that it.

I think it's because the images are flashing so fast, they're coming at something like the rate of frames in a motion picture, so it looks like a "morph," rather than a series of discrete images.

Is it downloadable? I'd love to count the actual image-per-second rate, and slow it down. Once it was slowed to something I could perceive as a series of images, and not a moving picture (ie, "morph"), then I'd like to see whether the effect when looking at the + is still there.

I really don't think anything mysterious is happening. I think we're just seeing still images that are so rapid we're being tricked into perceiving them as moving, and in addition to that, we're seeing them peripherally, so discrimination is very poor, and we can't catch on to the trick.

Just as a note, modern films are standardized at 24 frames per second, but that's because early sound films required that speed for good sound quality with sound-on-film. You can see a moving picture from a series of still flashed at a much slower speed, and some old silents were as slow as 14 frames per second.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 18 September 2011, 04:45 PM
missy_pooh_1997's Avatar
missy_pooh_1997 missy_pooh_1997 is offline
 
Join Date: 30 September 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,280
Default

How strange. Alot of the people looked like they had giant eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 17 November 2011, 02:07 PM
Luka_the_Pooka's Avatar
Luka_the_Pooka Luka_the_Pooka is offline
 
Join Date: 26 July 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrishDaDish View Post
The wall are bulging! And the dog looked like it had an Alien trying to get out!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 17 November 2011, 02:50 PM
granola shoes's Avatar
granola shoes granola shoes is offline
 
Join Date: 05 October 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthernLite View Post
That was just bizarre. I kept glancing over at the pictures to make sure it wasn't some trick but they all looked normal. And then when I looked back at the cross they all went creepy again. Weird.
That's the same experience I had. I kept seeing faces that appeared to be Sloth from the Goonies.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jack Palance's face snopes Entertainment 6 02 March 2011 11:52 PM
Gun blows up in face snopes Fauxtography 9 26 June 2009 12:35 PM
Saving face snopes Medical 3 14 January 2008 10:58 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.