snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Inboxer Rebellion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27 March 2007, 01:14 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 75,151
Icon81 Another birth control death

Comment: I just received this email and would like to know if it is true
or not.

---------------------

Recently this past week, my cousin Nicole Dishuk (age 31...newly grad
student with a doctorant degree about to start her new career as a
Doctor...) was flown into a nearby hospital, (She lives in Penn.) because
she passed out.

They found a blood clot in her neck, and immediately took her by
helicopter to the ER to operate. by the time they removed the right half
of her skull to relieve the pressure on her brain, the clot had spread to
her brain causing severe damge.

Since last Wednesday night, she was battling.. they induced her into a
coma to stop the blood flow, They operated 3 times..Finally, they said
there was nothing left that they could do.. they found multiple clots in
the left side of her brain.. the swelling wouldn't stop, and she was on
life support..She died at 4:30 yesterday. She leaves behind a husband, and
a 2 yr old Brandon and a 4yr old Justin.. The CAUSE of DEATH - they found
was a birth control she was taking that allows you to only have your
period 3 X's a year...

They said it interrupts life's menstrual cycle, and although
it is FDA approved... shouldn't be - So to the women in my address book- I
ask you to boycott this product & deal with you period once a month so you
can live the rest of the months that your life has in store for you.

*Please send this to every woman you know - you may save someone's life... Remember, you have a CYCLE for a reason!

Sincerely,
Jennifer Roselli
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27 March 2007, 01:22 AM
Mouse's Avatar
Mouse Mouse is offline
 
Join Date: 11 July 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,167
Mouse

Y'know if this birth control was so deadly, it might be helpful to actually name the product in question.

Mouse the "A certain kind of soft drink has been found to be lethal..." Louse
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27 March 2007, 01:24 AM
justusfour's Avatar
justusfour justusfour is offline
 
Join Date: 22 March 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouse View Post
Y'know if this birth control was so deadly, it might be helpful to actually name the product in question.

Mouse the "A certain kind of soft drink has been found to be lethal..." Louse
Technically I think most oral contraceptives, the patch, and the ring can cause blood clots, especially if the woman smokes or is already predisposed to blood clots.

ETA: I think side effects like that are caused by the estrogen in the products, not from not having a cycle every month.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27 March 2007, 01:27 AM
lazerus the duck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If they want to do comparisons surely they need to list it against all the women who died during childbirth.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27 March 2007, 02:47 AM
me, no really's Avatar
me, no really me, no really is offline
 
Join Date: 02 June 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justusfour View Post
Technically I think most oral contraceptives, the patch, and the ring can cause blood clots, especially if the woman smokes or is already predisposed to blood clots.

ETA: I think side effects like that are caused by the estrogen in the products, not from not having a cycle every month.
It is listed as a possible side effect in any birth control inserts I have read. I personally knew one woman who definitely and one who probably died as a result of stroke caused by hormonal birth control. It is also a possible side effect of pregnancy IIRC. This is the first time I have heard the risk linked to not menstruating though. I can see how the link could be made in someone who hasn't given it any thought though: "well, she didn't have periods so she had too much blood, so she got a clot and died". From what I understand this is not how the body works though - evan a little bit.

me
__________________
Check out my Handmade Pens
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27 March 2007, 02:53 AM
Nana M Nana M is offline
 
Join Date: 28 December 2006
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 411
Default

Unless things have changed, the only reason there is a lining to shed during menstruation is because the body prepares the uterus for pregnancy and if that doesn't happen, the uterine lining is sloughed off. Birth control supposedly mimics pregnancy, so no lining, no egg to fertalize, no period. The period you do get on some birth control is mostly for psychological reasons, not because it is neccessary for your health. If you took the pills each day, you would never have a period.

The clots are, unfortunately, due to the estrogen used for birth control. That's the reason for the 'mini-pills'. They are less risky.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27 March 2007, 02:54 AM
landmammal landmammal is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2006
Location: California
Posts: 935
Default

I think they're referring to Seasonale, which you take for 3 months straight, then a week off, so you'd get your period ~4 times a year. It's the exact same as another brand of BC (don't recall which one); it's just packaged differently.

I don't think it's riskier than any other oral contraceptive. Blood clots are a known risk of hormonal BC, but as my package insert kindly points out, oral contraceptives are safer than pregnancy/childbirth except for smokers over the age of 35.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27 March 2007, 03:32 AM
Ana Ng's Avatar
Ana Ng Ana Ng is offline
 
Join Date: 16 August 2000
Location: Copiague, NY
Posts: 9,531
Default

ETA: Okay, like 12 people posted since I opened the thread. Sorry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouse View Post
Y'know if this birth control was so deadly, it might be helpful to actually name the product in question.

Mouse the "A certain kind of soft drink has been found to be lethal..." Louse
The pill specifically marketed with fewer inactive pills for fewer periods is Seasonale. However, this has been done "off label" for years. There was no particular new pill created for this purpose.

The FDA didn't have to approve it because it was the same old pill. And the pill *can* kill you, but this isn't news. And it isn't common.
__________________
It don't make sense, going to heaven with the goodie-goodies dressed in white, I like black Timbs and black hoodies...
Work blog, personal blog.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27 March 2007, 03:58 AM
Doug4.7
 
Posts: n/a
Icon202

We have another death....must ban all birth control. Of course, no one ever died in childbirth....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:16 AM
J's Mommy J's Mommy is offline
 
Join Date: 22 February 2006
Location: Calera, Alabama
Posts: 158
Default

I know a woman who had a stroke attributed to birth control pills when she was in her early thirties. Of course, she smoked, drank, and did just about everything you aren't supposed to do while taking the pill. If used correctly, the pill is unlikely to cause any problem. I took them for years, and they were great.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:17 AM
FloridaGirl's Avatar
FloridaGirl FloridaGirl is offline
 
Join Date: 07 January 2007
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 2,412
Default

Clots don't spread. They may travel, but they don't "spread."
__________________
"I'm surprised Barrack Hussain Adolf Krippen Bundy Obama managed to fit in reading that in between The Koran, Mein Kampf, Das Kapital, the Satanic Bible and Heather Has Two Mommies." - BlueStar
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:18 AM
sneeze042's Avatar
sneeze042 sneeze042 is offline
 
Join Date: 02 December 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 746
Default

My cousin from Norway was on birth control, and she got what resembled a gluten allergy, which turned out to be due to the birth control. I don't know what BC she was on, but she had a lot of problems from it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:20 AM
Aud 1 Aud 1 is offline
 
Join Date: 05 October 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,037
Default

I know someone too who had a clot related to BCP she lost her sight. Of course she might have had a better outcome had the hospital not assumed she was drug seeking at first.

And if someone doesn't have a cycle what's the reason then.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:24 AM
Canuckistan's Avatar
Canuckistan Canuckistan is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 26,838
Icon102

Here appears to be Nicole Dishuk McKeon's obituary. She apparently died of a stroke.

Here's a version of the OP that doesn't appear to credit Jennifer Roselli.
__________________
C'mon now, who among us can say we don't have friends, close friends, trusted friends, whom we suspect would molest our children when our back is turned? I know I do! (Chloe)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:48 AM
justusfour's Avatar
justusfour justusfour is offline
 
Join Date: 22 March 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aud 1 View Post
I know someone too who had a clot related to BCP she lost her sight. Of course she might have had a better outcome had the hospital not assumed she was drug seeking at first.

And if someone doesn't have a cycle what's the reason then.
The estrogen in the pills (and patches and rings) is what causes blood clots. Not having a cycle every month has nothing to do with developing blood clots.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27 March 2007, 04:51 AM
Nana M Nana M is offline
 
Join Date: 28 December 2006
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aud 1 View Post
I know someone too who had a clot related to BCP she lost her sight. Of course she might have had a better outcome had the hospital not assumed she was drug seeking at first.

And if someone doesn't have a cycle what's the reason then.
I'm not sure I'm interpreting your question correctly, but you cycle so you can get pregnant. If you don't want to get pregnant, why cycle? If there is no egg, there's no lining and no 'blood buildup'. You don't NEED a period unless the whole egg, lining, shedding happens.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27 March 2007, 05:52 AM
geminilee's Avatar
geminilee geminilee is offline
 
Join Date: 02 December 2005
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J's Mommy View Post
I know a woman who had a stroke attributed to birth control pills when she was in her early thirties. Of course, she smoked, drank, and did just about everything you aren't supposed to do while taking the pill. If used correctly, the pill is unlikely to cause any problem. I took them for years, and they were great.
Actually, the pill can cause clots in people predisposed, as was mentioned earlier. It can happen even if you do not smoke. And I think drinking would actually lower your risk of clots, as it thins the blood.
I had blood clots in my leg when I was 16, because of an autoimmune disorder that was exacerbated by the hormones in the pill. Any sort of hormones can trigger clots, it has nothing to do with the lack of periods.
__________________
"[N]o definition of freedom would be completely without the freedom to take the consequences. Indeed, it is the freedom upon which all the others are based." -Terry Pratchett
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27 March 2007, 09:49 AM
Lady Neeva Lady Neeva is offline
 
 
Join Date: 13 February 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,094
Default

This is another case where I'd (mildly) like to find the author of something and hit them upside the head with a cluebyfour.

This particular cluebyfour consists of pointing out that there are some women who no longer have periods/cycles and they aren't dead from blood clots caused by that. Like women who've gone through menopause, or had a hysterectomy as a result of trauma stuff like that.

Yes, hormonal birth control can cause clots, strokes and other assorted problems... it's one reason I wouldn't feel comfortable taking them myself. Fortunately, if I were to wake up pregnant one morning I have a good husband so I can afford to do that. Otherwise I'd have to fall back on celibacy lol.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28 March 2007, 06:13 PM
DawnStorm's Avatar
DawnStorm DawnStorm is offline
 
Join Date: 11 March 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 8,097
Icon220

Several years ago, I had a DVT caused by taking The Pill. Doesn't make The Pill bad, it just meant that I could no longer take it. So much for trying to control my cycle!

Dawn--YMMV--Storm
__________________
My dogs follow me wherever I go, if only out of a sense of curiosity.
To date, I should point out that I have never flipped a burger in my life. Many a bird, yes, but never a burger. -- Canuckistan
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 21 April 2007, 12:50 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 75,151
Pill that eliminates the period gets mixed reviews

For many women, a birth control pill that eliminates monthly menstruation might seem a welcome milestone.

But others view their periods as fundamental symbols of fertility and health, researchers have found. Rather than loathing their periods, women evidently carry on complex love-hate relationships with them.

This ambivalence is one reason that a decision expected by the Food and Drug Administration has engendered controversy. The agency is expected to approve the first contraceptive pill that is designed to eliminate periods as long as a woman takes it. Doctors say they know of no extra risk to the new regimen, but some women are uneasy about the idea

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/...e/20period.php
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.