snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > NFBSK Gone Wild!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16 October 2009, 09:15 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 75,151
United Kingdom British men have more stamina in bed than foreigners, study finds

British men have more stamina between the sheets than their foreign counterparts – lasting just 10 minutes, a study has found.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...udy-finds.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16 October 2009, 10:16 AM
Andrew of Ware's Avatar
Andrew of Ware Andrew of Ware is offline
 
Join Date: 22 April 2003
Location: Ware, England
Posts: 5,501
Default

British men have traditionally given our women a hard time.

One person had an orgasm after six seconds? Come on - you're having a laugh.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:54 AM
Mosherette's Avatar
Mosherette Mosherette is offline
 
Join Date: 21 February 2000
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 12,708
Default

Not in my experience they don't
__________________
Your disbelief does not change the nature of reality. - BringTheNoise
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16 October 2009, 01:51 PM
Tarquin Farquart's Avatar
Tarquin Farquart Tarquin Farquart is offline
 
Join Date: 20 November 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 15,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew of Ware View Post
One person had an orgasm after six seconds?
Six seconds? Show-off.
__________________
Je pouvoir a le cheeseburgeur? Non, je suis amoureux d'une belette rock n roll.
Joueb-Alouette-Visage-livre
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16 October 2009, 02:40 PM
Ana Ng's Avatar
Ana Ng Ana Ng is offline
 
Join Date: 16 August 2000
Location: Copiague, NY
Posts: 9,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew of Ware View Post
One person had an orgasm after six seconds? Come on - you're having a laugh.
I know it was a guy, but I can definitely do it in six seconds if I'm really- well, you know.

Also, when you're with a virgin, it can definitely happen in under 6 seconds. It's happened to me- I wasn't the climaxing party, though.

I don't understand all the emphasis put on lengthy sex sessions- rapid fire sex can be very good, and very intense, and you can do it again almost right away. It's not the be all and end all of sex, doing it that way. 10 minutes can be an eternity. ETA: Not that the sex part is boring, I just personally can't go that long usually without climaxing.)
__________________
It don't make sense, going to heaven with the goodie-goodies dressed in white, I like black Timbs and black hoodies...
Work blog, personal blog.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16 October 2009, 06:13 PM
MapleLeaf's Avatar
MapleLeaf MapleLeaf is offline
 
Join Date: 17 September 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,011
Default

Quote:
However, another participant in the research put in a 52-minute performance before peaking.
But whyyy? 52 minutes from the first kiss to collapsing on the bed all sweaty sounds good. But 52 minutes of actual sex just sounds tiring and probably sore.
Quote:
The study, published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, was examining premature ejaculation. The condition is medically defined as the inability to last more than a minute.
Really? If you last for a minute-thirty that's considered within the range of normal? I'd still think you'd probably feel like getting some help for that.
__________________
"But that crosses beyond mere pipe dream onto full on watermain fantasy."
-Joe Bentley
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:02 PM
Elwood's Avatar
Elwood Elwood is offline
 
Join Date: 28 February 2003
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,517
Default

Quote:
But whyyy? 52 minutes from the first kiss to collapsing on the bed all sweaty sounds good. But 52 minutes of actual sex just sounds tiring and probably sore.
As many who have been on substantial doses of SSRIs can attest, no doubt!

El "less is more" wood
__________________
Blog is a horrible word. It sounds like throwing up. Bahloooooogah! Ew! Try Elwood's Nerjal instead! (As of 16 November, 2009 it's actually active again!)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:10 PM
Artemis's Avatar
Artemis Artemis is offline
 
Join Date: 08 October 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 5,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MapleLeaf View Post
But whyyy? 52 minutes from the first kiss to collapsing on the bed all sweaty sounds good. But 52 minutes of actual sex just sounds tiring and probably sore.
Agreed...I don't think my girly bits could take it!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:33 PM
Dactyl's Avatar
Dactyl Dactyl is offline
 
Join Date: 02 December 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosherette View Post
Not in my experience they don't
Mine neither. My personal sample puts germans well ahead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ana Ng View Post
I don't understand all the emphasis put on lengthy sex sessions- rapid fire sex can be very good, and very intense, and you can do it again almost right away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MapleLeaf View Post
But whyyy? 52 minutes from the first kiss to collapsing on the bed all sweaty sounds good. But 52 minutes of actual sex just sounds tiring and probably sore
Hurrah, someone finally said it. I have nothing against long drawn out foreplay, removal of clothes and sex play, but one you're actually doing it 52 minutes sounds like an eternity!
__________________
Move the bloody pram!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:49 PM
Aimee Evilpixie's Avatar
Aimee Evilpixie Aimee Evilpixie is offline
 
Join Date: 20 January 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,514
Hello Kitty

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis View Post
Agreed...I don't think my girly bits could take it!
This is what I dislike about a lot of mainstream porn. "Her vagina would be rubbed raw at this point! Good lord, just finish!"
__________________
"We’re guarding the Swedish fish. Hurry."

Are you a gamer who doesn't like stressful, overly-complicated games? Join us!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16 October 2009, 11:49 PM
Beachlife! Beachlife! is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 17,206
Default

There are so many factors involved, I don't think a single reading for any one person would be sufficient. Time, place and partner are important factors along with state of mind to name just a few.
__________________
Another blog update, to cleanse the horror that was the last post: Confessions of a Dragon's scribe
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17 October 2009, 12:20 AM
Ana Ng's Avatar
Ana Ng Ana Ng is offline
 
Join Date: 16 August 2000
Location: Copiague, NY
Posts: 9,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dactyl View Post
Hurrah, someone finally said it. I have nothing against long drawn out foreplay, removal of clothes and sex play, but one you're actually doing it 52 minutes sounds like an eternity!
Kind of like a tapas approach to sex.

IME, often longer sex sessions have been more often the result of dysfunction than shorter ones. Longer ones are more likely to result from the other party's inability to climax, whereas short instances are often short because they're so good. I've not ever met a premature ejaculator but I was married to someone who couldn't due to stress. That could go on for well over an hour with pharmaceutical intervention, but ended up being worse for both of us.
__________________
It don't make sense, going to heaven with the goodie-goodies dressed in white, I like black Timbs and black hoodies...
Work blog, personal blog.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17 October 2009, 12:30 AM
crocoduck_hunter's Avatar
crocoduck_hunter crocoduck_hunter is offline
 
Join Date: 27 May 2009
Location: Roseburg, OR
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimee Evilpixie View Post
This is what I dislike about a lot of mainstream porn. "Her vagina would be rubbed raw at this point! Good lord, just finish!"
Yeah, that's why I don't bother with "feature film" style porn- the sex scenes last a lot longer than my attention span.
__________________
I would refuse to allow to be sentenced under any blasphemy law on the grounds that it violates my Constitutional right to face my accuser. If God has a problem with something I said, I want him called as a material witness- JoeBentley
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.