![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
David
__________________
www.facebook.com/KingDavid8 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Whilst I'm sure this will be improved on, I don't think photoshop editors will be too worried just yet, as the latter images didn't look up to much to me. The depth of field, orientation and size matching will be very hard to get right. I can see the user having to search a lot for the right blend of images.
This could end up looking like a free babel fish translation, which turns coherent sentences into random words. Also, I wonder how they'll deal with any issues of copyright? Probably not. ETA: I suppose Jenn is going to be a lot busier! Last edited by jw; 06 October 2009 at 12:18 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm dubious that this software is real. I know that imaging software can be capable of some amazing things, but as someone who uses Photoshop on a daily basis, I'm skeptical that this program is anything more than fiction.
__________________
"It would be painful to carry scorpions in one's rectum. I don't advise it." - My Husband My Cat Is So Ugly - My tongue-in-cheek Kitty Blog |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm skeptical of this program as well. I'll wait until they can provide an actual demonstration of the program before I actually believe this works.
They claim to be pulling these images off the internet. They could use a system like Flickr's which would have all the images tagged. The part I'm skeptical about is the matching of the sketches to pieces of the images. In the video the show the program finding and cutting out the frisbee out of a picture of a dog and a frisbee. It somehow matches that piece of the image to a badly drawn semi-oval line. That is some crazy computer-vision AI right there. Though it may be simple for a human, that is an incredibly complex problem for a computer. Being able to cut a human shape out of a background and match it to a crude-stick figure drawing is pretty amazing. So amazing in fact that I'm disinclined to believe their claims until they produce some proof. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Silas |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not to mention the ethics of pulling images off the internet apparently without permission to use them.
__________________
"I'm gonna go comatose for a few hours, hallucinate vividly, and then maybe suffer amnesia about the whole experience." Help grant a wish. http://www.wishuponahero.com |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Telegraph has this about it.
Looking up Crunchgear, who are usually reliable, I find this hyperbole statement, Quote:
Quote:
However, my original comment is still valid. The images don't look anywhere near real enough to me. Imagine cutting out a bunch of magazine pictures and pasting them on another magazine picture, all kinds of stuff like shadows etc., would be missing. Unless they really find a way of altering the pasted images an awful lot of manual editing would have to be done to make these images look realistic, therefore defeating the purpose. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It was presented at Adobe's Max Conference as an experiment based on theoretical algorithms. Nowhere near anything actually functional.
Here's a link to a Photoshop product manager's blog about it. The linked page also has a link to the research paper. ETA- The video is a demonstration of how it might work. It doesn't purport to show working software. Last edited by SchmooPie; 10 October 2009 at 12:35 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let's see some photographs generated for xkcd characters.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|