![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's something I've been told by several people, which sounds fishy to me, but who knows, so I'm going to run it past snopesters, some of whom must belong to the relevant religions.
Here it is: you can be married and a Roman Catholic priest under certain special circumstances. Episcopalian (other Anglicans too, but people tend to mention the E church, not the Church of England, of whatever) and Eastern Orthodox priests can be married. They also can choose to continue to be priests if they convert to Roman Catholicism, but if they are married, they continue to be married in the eyes of the church, even if they remain priests. This seems questionable for many reasons. While I could believe that possibly somebody already ordained as Episcopalian or Eastern Orthodox might be allowed to use their seminary degree to apply for ordination, I think they would still have to apply, and then be ordained, and it is at ordination that the vow of chastity is taken. So I think having a spouse would mean your application would be tossed. Now, I don't know how the RC views the non-RC marriages of people who convert as a couple. Maybe blessing the marriage is part of the conversion, turning the marriage into an RC marriage. But I'd think that the non-RC marriage would be at least questionable until there had been some hand-waving, and the converts (or convert, if just one spouse becomes RC) could choose not to convert the marriage, as it were, and that this would open up the possibility for ordination. But that's probably true for any convert, with the distinction that someone who has not been to seminary has to go. On the other hand, I also know the RC church is having a priest shortage, so maybe they have approved something like this. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I just don't want to date an older woman. They look at love with a jaundiced eye. I can jaundice a woman on my own, I don't need her to be pre-jaundiced. -- Garrison Keillor, as Guy Noir |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Byzantine-Rite Catholic clergy are allowed to be married, so I presume if an Eastern Orthodox married priest converted, it is likely he would be part of the Byzantine Rite anyway, since the services woudl be familiar to him.
As for married Episcopal clergy joining the RC-Latin Rite, the last Pope specifically made it permissible for them to do so and remain married. Quote:
Nick |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Historically in the UK, when Henry VIII created the Church of England, those clergy who joined the new church were allowed to marry. His immediate successor Edward was also anglican; however his successor, Mary, was Catholic. As I understand it the clergy then followed catholic doctrine and either had to have their marriage annulled, or live a considerable distance (I think 100 miles) from their wives, with no physical contact.
I also believe that the Greek Orthodox church has rank-specific rules; Deacons and Priests can be married (but must have married before ordination); but Bishops must be unmarried |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry if this thread is a bit dead, but here's a blog maintained by a married priest: http://gkupsidedown.blogspot.com/ - he was a Church of England priest before converting, but now is a Catholic school chaplain in the U.S. He regularly shows pictures of his family, including ones where his son is acting as an altar boy.
Also, Mycroft is right about the Orthodox. They, as well as the Eastern Catholic Rites, allow men to marry before ordination to the priesthood, but only allow celibate men to be bishops. Also, the Latin Rite (what most people think of when they think "Catholic") allows married men to become deacons. I must admit that I always found it odd that a married layman* can become a priest if he was an Anglican or Lutheran priest before converting, yet a "cradle" Latin-Rite Catholic may not. Oh, and regarding RivkahChaya's question about the marriages of non-Catholics still being recognized by the Church if the couple converts - My understanding is that a couple who converts would have their marriage recognized without any trouble. Two Lutherans who get married in the Lutheran church and then choose to become Catholic would be considered validly married in the eyes of the Church. *The Catholic Church doesn't consider Anglican and Lutheran ordination valid. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I also remember reading some autobiography by the son of a Greek orthodox priest who claimed that not only are priests allowed to marry, the church actively urges them to do, so their wives can help them taking care of the parish (for free of course).
__________________
“If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, it's just possible you haven't grasped the situation. ” / Jean Kerr |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Deacons also seem to have more say in where they serve. While a priest is expected to serve wherever the archbishop places him, a deacon seems to be able to choose an area - not their "home" church, but one in the same town where they and their family live.
__________________
There is nothing to fear except fear itself...and spiders. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Note also that an unmarried seminary graduate who is expecting to become a priest is often assigned to be a lay assistant to a parish until the time is married and then becomes ordained. Perhaps that is the source of the confusion. Nick |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kind of a nitpick/random fact but a priest who is a widower can become a Bishop.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
A widower is unmarried by definition
WRT to other posts - the item I found was from the Australian Greek Orthodox church and they mentioned the situation in other Orthodox churches very briefly. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Catholic Church recently announced that it is going to set up an Anglican Ordinariate. This could open the door for many married Anglican priests to be ordained in the Catholic Church. It comes after years of petitions to the Vatican by Continuing Anglican groups (primarily the TAC - Traditional Anglican Communion).
Basically, the Vatican set up a way for large numbers of former Anglicans to convert without worrying that an unsympathetic local bishop will demand they abandon traditional liturgical practices (a valid fear considering how hard it is for average Catholics to retain traditional practices). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|