![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Is the following a correct statement by James Madsion?
"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries." - James Madison, 4th president of the United States |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Apparently So A quick Google search (at the level of which even I am capable, and I am rather a Google moron) shows numerous attributions.
Silas |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This blog: http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/madison.htm has moved the quote to it's "phony James Madison quotes" section on the grounds that a source can't be found, and here's another discussion of it: http://candst.tripod.com/quotpurp.htm |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fascinating! I had (naively?) thought that the large number of sources was at least a rough indication of validity.
Also, to James Madison, the English Civil War was about as recent a memory as WWI is to us; religious civil war was one thing our framers knew full well they did *not* want happening here. This, too, led me to believe the quote. Ah, well! Phooey on those who would poison the waters of truth with shoddy scholarship! Silas (having done it at least once himself...) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Steve's post ultimately points to the late Molly Ivins's role as a prominent vector of this alleged Madison quote, which appears to have first seen the light of day in the early 1990s.
Interestingly, I think, Ivins's use of that particular passage way back in 1991 certainly raised some suspicions at the offices of The Columbia Journalism Review. It appeared in a piece she wrote for the November/December issue, Quote:
Quote:
Who knows, perhaps Faulk, an admirer of Madison, had merely paraphrased something found in Madison's writings; Ivins may have misinterpreted the sentiment as a direct quote. (For what it's worth, the only thing Madisonian I can find that bears some vague similarity is his Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments [1785], particularly paragraph 11, which contains a mention that "[t]orrents of blood have been split in the old world, by vain attempts of the secular arm, to extinguish Religious discord, by proscribing all difference in Religious opinion." Actually, other printings have "split" as "spilt," which makes more sense to me. Other than that, I got nothing.) -- Bonnie |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|