With the tension built into this election, with so much at stake, and with *gasp* an “n-word” running for the Presidency*, I’m surprised there hasn’t been a lot more of this sort of thing going on.
As hateful as the far extremes of both sides can be, I do have to say, it is the far right that excels with death threats and threats of violence. I think it has something to do with the fact that folks on the far-right tend to be “take matters into your own hands” type folks, while the folks on the far left tend to try and paint themselves as victims of one sort or another, an action that would be sort of diminished if they were making active death threats against the object of their ire.
You have now been enlightened on Goober’s “totally inconsequential and obvious rant of the day”.
*Which, as I’ve said before, is a pitiful excuse for those using it if Obama were not elected as president, but would be a totally understandable reason for threats of violence against him. The former relies on 50% of Americans being rank closet racists. The latter relies only on one person being a racist. Former, not so much. Latter, totally believable (and almost expected, unfortunately).
And to Skeptic’s comment, I would also add “why are only threats against Sen. Obama making the news?” It is a cinch that someone, somewhere, is making threats against McCain, who is a disabled war hero. Why do only the threats against Obama make the grade?
|