snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > We've Got Mail

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15 October 2007, 08:00 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Tantrum Reading is hard!

Comment: It would be very helpful and time-saving if you could indicate
in/on your "headlines" the "answer" of True or False; e.g., Title >
Response, then provide verbal dialogue for our enlightenment.

I would like to access the subject and immediately get your take on T/F,
and not have to click on the story and read the entire explanation. If I
want to send this report to someone, I can always copy and send. But it is
way too cumbersome and ime consuming to have to click on your response and
read its entirety to find out your answer!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21 October 2007, 12:18 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Tantrum

Comment: While I do find your site very informative, I do have an issue.
My friends have stated the same issue when discussing your site.

Why do you continuously have long explanations concerning whether some is
true or not. The explanations are reduntant in content and view. It just
goes on and on. The issue should be stated; the origin and then the status
of the issue.

It's like a person having to say a 10000 words when it could be done in
50. It is a major distraction from an otherwise good site. At this point,
I have lost interest in the site due to the unncessary reading of useless
material.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21 October 2007, 12:26 AM
JoeBentley's Avatar
JoeBentley JoeBentley is offline
 
Join Date: 23 June 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 21,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snopes View Post
Comment: While I do find your site very informative, I do have an issue. My friends have stated the same issue when discussing your site.

Why do you continuously have long explanations concerning whether some is true or not. The explanations are reduntant in content and view. It just
goes on and on. The issue should be stated; the origin and then the status
of the issue.

It's like a person having to say a 10000 words when it could be done in
50. It is a major distraction from an otherwise good site. At this point,
I have lost interest in the site due to the unncessary reading of useless
material.
So the color coded bullets right below the claim aren't enough of a quick summery for you?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21 October 2007, 02:35 PM
Bassist
 
Posts: n/a
Icon202

Quote:
Comment: While I do find your site very informative, I do have an issue.
My friends have stated the same issue when discussing your site.

Why do you continuously have long explanations concerning whether some is
true or not. The explanations are reduntant in content and view. It just
goes on and on. The issue should be stated; the origin and then the status
of the issue.

It's like a person having to say a 10000 words when it could be done in
50. It is a major distraction from an otherwise good site. At this point,
I have lost interest in the site due to the unncessary reading of useless
material.
Okay, Snopes - just summarize your web pages into a simple "True" or "False" category to please the masses. Then get ready for the intelligensio to start requesting data and citations to support your conclusions!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23 October 2007, 02:04 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon204

Comment: Social Security - article that describes what went on with the
Senate vote to allow illegal aliens to collect social security - Senator
Ensign's bill to table the motion....or whatever. Your explanation is SO
confusing that I could not follow it at all.

I could not understand what the senators who voted YEA were voting on.
Could you please clarify?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26 October 2007, 06:55 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Shout

Comment: WHEN YOU LIST THE LEGENDS AS YOU DID DOWN BELOW, WHY DON'T YOU LIST THAT THEY ARE HOAXES OR REAL AFTER THE LITTLE PARAGRAPH. SAVE A LOT OF TIME AND TROUBLE ESPECIALLY WHEN A COMPUTER IS VERY SLOW. WOULD APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26 October 2007, 12:16 PM
Lancastrian's Avatar
Lancastrian Lancastrian is offline
 
Join Date: 17 March 2007
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snopes View Post
Comment: Social Security - article that describes what went on with the
Senate vote to allow illegal aliens to collect social security - Senator
Ensign's bill to table the motion....or whatever. Your explanation is SO
confusing that I could not follow it at all.

I could not understand what the senators who voted YEA were voting on.
Could you please clarify?
Pssst: "Yea" means "Yes".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23 January 2008, 06:47 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon95

Comment: I'm confused and must be interpreting your article incorrectly.
Help me understand what I am doing wrong. In the article about Obama's
being a radical Muslim who will not say the Pledge of Allegiance is marked
by a bullet meaning false. But within the article itself it says that
O'bama is a dangerous Muslim who used the Quaran during his swearing in
and also turned his back on the flag. Obviously, the false bullet and the
article itself do not agree. What am I doing wrong when interpreting the
information. This is my first time using Snopes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23 January 2008, 11:57 AM
queen of the caramels's Avatar
queen of the caramels queen of the caramels is offline
 
Join Date: 24 November 2005
Location: Quebec
Posts: 4,134
Royalty

Quote:
Originally Posted by snopes View Post
. But within the article itself it says that
O'bama is a dangerous Muslim who used the Quaran during his swearing in
and also turned his back on the flag.
Ah, yes, it's the Irish side of Obama's family coming out.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30 March 2008, 07:31 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon02

Comment: I just love your site and use it all the time and have passed
snoops on to all my friends. If there was any one thing that could improve
it it would be putting the true/false/possible first thing in the answer.
Most of the time I read the biggest share of the answer, but there are
times in this fast paced world I just don't have time to read a full
lenghtly artical to find the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 30 March 2008, 09:54 PM
Canuckistan's Avatar
Canuckistan Canuckistan is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 30,099
D'oh!

Quote:
Originally Posted by snopes View Post
Comment: I just love your site and use it all the time and have passed snoops on to all my friends.
Sounds fun. If illiterate.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30 March 2008, 10:01 PM
lord_feldon's Avatar
lord_feldon lord_feldon is online now
 
Join Date: 08 August 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,259
Default

Maybe snoops is some kind of disease.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30 March 2008, 10:29 PM
Wild Redhead's Avatar
Wild Redhead Wild Redhead is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lord_feldon View Post
Maybe snoops is some kind of disease.
Is there a vaccine available to prevent a spread of snoops?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30 March 2008, 10:45 PM
lord_feldon's Avatar
lord_feldon lord_feldon is online now
 
Join Date: 08 August 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,259
Default

There might be, but it's bad because it promotes whatever activity that causes snoops to spread. The best way to not spread snoops is to not engage in snoops-spreading activities, ever.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30 March 2008, 11:19 PM
RivkahChaya's Avatar
RivkahChaya RivkahChaya is offline
 
Join Date: 14 July 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,275
Default

Like reading.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02 April 2008, 11:47 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon95

Comment: I looked up Gas Buying Tips and in fact it is listed in your
archives.
Is this a rumor or is it actually true? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16 April 2008, 06:33 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon95

Comment: Why do you consider Reagan's diary entry as false?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/kinsley.asp
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10 May 2008, 06:44 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Icon95

Comment: Could you put a
one or two sentence summary on the top of each article? Sometimes its
hard to distinguish what you say is true and what rumor emails say is
true. I know its important to read the whole article, but it would be
good to start reading it in the right mindset.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 30 May 2008, 05:57 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 107,977
Tantrum

Comment: I passed on the warning regarding the "POSTCARD" virus after
reading your verification of it. It was pointed out to me that I should
have read the bottom of the story. As a busy person, I only read the top
few paragraphs. I think it would be helpful if there were a caveat up
front. I am sure that I am not the only one to read a sentence or two and
move on. I appreciate the service you provide, I just think this may be an
improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30 May 2008, 06:15 PM
Eve MG's Avatar
Eve MG Eve MG is offline
 
Join Date: 17 December 2003
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,809
Default

I have this problem occasionally, I get emails that say, "This was verified as TRUE on snopes!" Then I go *actually read* the snopes page and find out that while the main idea might be true, the advice in the email isn't good/accurate. Like the petition for the boy who wants to start a Firefighters' Day - it's true, but it's been updated.

Last edited by snopes; 19 June 2008 at 07:05 PM. Reason: clarity, overuse of asterisks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.