![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw this in a myspace group, the person cut and pasted it from a different group she was on. The response posted is written by a supposed pedophile.
Please forgive me in my lack of compute knowledge, I'm not sure how to show the images so I added the location from where the images are from. Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Two things: first, the original message sounds like whoever wrote it did not know what they were talking about; second, the response was probably written by a troll trying to freak people out, and not by an actual pedophile.
__________________
He that cannot reason is a fool. He that will not is a bigot. He that dare not is a slave. -- Andrew Carnegie |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The blog is back! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Why do you press harder on the buttons of a remote control when you know the batteries are dead? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heh. I used to have a T-shirt that had the "boylove" symbol on it. Luckily, this wasn't circulating then, or else I'd have to worry about random people "beating the **** out of me" while walking about town. Who knew second-hand clothing was so fraught with peril?
Yongary"10 yo pedophile"2.0 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a lengthy wikipedia article on pro pedophile activism that does indicate the boylove and girlove symbols do stand for what is mentioned. However I could see how those symbols could be worn or displayed by someone unsure of their meaning, the heart one especially looks innocent to me.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
But that very article on wiki has a big notice about the facts being in dispute and stuff. How much can you really trust wiki in the first place?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
About as much as you can trust a randomly selected group of people you know little to nothing about. This article in particular has apparently been subject to some behind the scenes fighting between the pro-pedophile activist types and the protect children at all costs types.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
So what if some guys on a message board have decided to adopt these symbols? That doesn't make these particular meanings universally accepted. Certainly it hasn't stopped Unilever continuing to use their logo (though they are probably Not Amused), and I'm pretty sure I've seen the triangle one before too.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought I recognised that! It's the Walls logo.
I bet the triangle one can be found somewhere else too. They're using simple shapes in a spiral, nothing special. This makes the email dangerous because legitimately innocent people can be caught up in mistaken identity cases, and those activitists using the symbols might see otherwise innocent uses of their symbols and get an over-inflated sense of gratification ("They're using my symbol, they must support me!"). --- Obesie. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, that's one of the brand names Unilever uses internationally for its ice cream. All these brands use the same logo.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you look closely, though, the Unilever logo and the "girl love" logo spiral in different directions.
Nevertheless, this is pretty dumb. Whether these symbols mean anything or not, it would be incredibly easy for someone to say, "Oh, this looks cute" and put it on their MySpace without knowing what it means. And it certainly does not give one a reason to beat them up. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|