![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Did George Bush make this quote: "The California crunch really is
the result of not enough power-generating plants and then not enough power to power the power of generating plants". This was supposedly quoted by Bush coming from the New York Times, January 14, 2001. Is this statement true or false?? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
NY Times interview
Quote:
__________________
What a wonderfully sensible idea. Which, of course, means loud fundie idiots will be in an uproar over it. - Vilified http://www.kiva.org/team/atheists |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Despite the grotesque inelegance of the language, it is scientifically valid: you can build as many power plants as you want, but without fuel, they won't generate any electricity.
Silas ("Fuel me once, shame on you... won't get fueled again...") |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or does that count as "fuel"?
__________________
"Beneath my goody two shoes lie some very dark socks." - Lisa Simpson |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes that counts, but if a windmill isn't catching wind (fuel), it isn't generating power.
__________________
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away!" Tom Waits, Step Right Up |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|