snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Inboxer Rebellion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 28 January 2007, 06:15 AM
bjohn13
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marie19 View Post
See, this is exactly why my mom tells me "if it tastes good, eat it" (or drink it), and not to think/worry about what could/might be in it! Now I'm going to be freaking out over what might be in my cheap bottled water. *shivers*
Half my problem is that tap water does not drink or taste good to me. I can tolerate some bottled water, and the stuff we get from Lindsay Ecosystems at work has a decent taste as well, but I crave the stuff I keep at home.

For the record, most bottled water I've distilled has considerably less residue left over. Those Britta water filters also fliter out a noticable amount, but the reverse osmosis kits you can install on your tap seem to the best job besides actual distilling. Granted, these comparisons have been made in an unscientific manner.

I remember showing one friend my distiller before cleaning it once, and the guy actually wiped his finger in the powder and tasted it. I asked him if he knew what he was tasting, and he said, "yeah. It's dried water." Twenty minutes of arguing couldn't convince this guy that there was actually stuff dissolved in his water.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04 November 2007, 11:04 PM
scubabeme
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(I'm in a water utility) Taste is very much a personal thing. The actual taste of water without contaminants like hydrocarbons, geosmin, and others, is determined primarily by what minerals are dissolved in it. Distilled and deionized water have virtually no minerals in them, so to many people taste "flat". Others perfer that taste to mineral-rich water. Therefore, objectionable tatse does not mean it's unhealthy. I personally like the taste of the water our utility produces, than the one in which I live. (used to live in "ours" but moved due to housing availability). "Ferrous" stains on plumbing fixtures may well be caused by manganese and not iron as assumed. Managanese is frequently to blame for the discoloration of clothes. Our utility uses a process that causes dissolved manganese to solidify and therfore be filtered out of the final product. Based on empirical data (not taste or assumption) MOST water utlities produce water that is every bit as high quality as bottled water. In some cases, EXACTLY the same since some bottled water companies have been known to essentially bottle tap water after adding some extra minerals to "enhance" the taste. ONe actually uses reverse osmosis (removes even minerals, similar to distillation) and then adds minerals back in. Yes, occasionally things willl go wrong and tap water MAY not meet the EPA's stringent requirements. (And yes, they are very picky, contrary to conspiracy theories), but by and large their standards are exceeded (on the good side!). Our utility uses a "micro" filtration process that passes the water through 0.1 micron pores. Bacteria cannot pass through it! The chloramines (chlorine/ammonia compound) added during the process take care of viruses before the water ever leaves the plant. Our measureable/quantifiable water quality parameters are several times better than what is required by the EPA/local health department.

And lastly, a kilogram or E.coli in a year?!?!? #1, a kilogram of ANY bactreria is an astronomical quantity--roughly 1,600,000,000,000 cells. (see http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/LouisSiu.shtml) #2, the chlorine/chloramines used the processing would kill them, so you'd be "consuming" dead bacteria. No harm, no foul. Hey, you eat dead stuff all the time, don't you?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05 November 2007, 04:00 PM
Keeper of the Mad Bunnies's Avatar
Keeper of the Mad Bunnies Keeper of the Mad Bunnies is offline
 
Join Date: 07 January 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjohn13 View Post
Gasses trapped in the water are also included in that 1.7% figure that is cited in a pamphlet my city sends out once a year to all residents with a mailing address.
b "not exactly a scientist, but I learned about them in high school" john13
Would it look like this?

I don't see anything in the pamphlet concerning 1.7%.

James Powell
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07 November 2007, 02:56 AM
ChildofMusic's Avatar
ChildofMusic ChildofMusic is offline
 
Join Date: 24 October 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 385
Default

I just want to know how the author went from 1 kilo Escherichia coli to 2 pounds of poo. I work with E. coli every day, and while it does have it's own stinky "aroma," it certainly is not poo.

Child of "What's that smell? Oh, it's just the poo in the petri plate." Music
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 14 March 2008, 06:03 PM
johannabartley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If this is true then I'm never drinking water again. Only bottled or distilled. But alcohol drinking is not an option. I get the joke but many might think you're offering an alternative. Teenagers especially might not consider the irony and take it as a fact.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 14 March 2008, 06:37 PM
diddy's Avatar
diddy diddy is offline
 
Join Date: 07 March 2004
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 10,339
Default

Didn't Adam Savage of Mythbusters once quote "there's poo everywhere!"
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 14 March 2008, 07:14 PM
WildaBeast's Avatar
WildaBeast WildaBeast is offline
 
Join Date: 18 July 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 10,049
Throw Tomato

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddy View Post
Didn't Adam Savage of Mythbusters once quote "there's poo everywhere!"
I don't know, but that sounds more like something Mike Rowe of Dirty Jobs would say.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 14 March 2008, 07:54 PM
diddy's Avatar
diddy diddy is offline
 
Join Date: 07 March 2004
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 10,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildaBeast View Post
I don't know, but that sounds more like something Mike Rowe of Dirty Jobs would say.
I know it wasn't Rowe. The episode of Mythbusters is referencing a myth of your toothbrushes being infected by fecal chloroform via a tolet. They found that the stuff is everywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 15 March 2008, 06:44 AM
Bassist
 
Posts: n/a
Soapbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by scubabeme View Post
And lastly, a kilogram or E.coli in a year?!?!? #1, a kilogram of ANY bactreria is an astronomical quantity--roughly 1,600,000,000,000 cells. (see http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/LouisSiu.shtml) #2, the chlorine/chloramines used the processing would kill them, so you'd be "consuming" dead bacteria. No harm, no foul. Hey, you eat dead stuff all the time, don't you?
Thanks for the clarification on the water standards, and the support for my belief that most of our tap water is perfectly safe to drink.

Regarding your bacterial count - I think you're missing a few zeros in your number. I reviewed the link you provided, but it didn't match with my training - and my textbooks are all at work right now. My graduate studies in microbiology (albiet a few decades ago ) yielded the following information (numbers are approximate, but within an order of magnitude):

Bacteria detected in feces (both aerobic and anaerobic) = 1 * 10^12 per gram

Approximate bacterial composition of feces = 90% anaerobic and 10% aerobic (over half of which is E. coli). For calculations shown below, I took a conservative approach and assumed only 1% was E. coli.

Maximum possible concentration of E. coli (centrifuged pellet) = 3 * 10^12 per gram

Allowable quantity of E. coli in tap water (per EPA guidelines when I was in college - since changed in 2007 to allow zero E. coli) = 1 per 100 mL (0.1 liter)

Using a backwards calculation from the assumption that "drinking 1 liter of water daily yields 1 kilogram of feces per year," that liter of water would have to contain in the neighborhood of 2.7 * 10^7 cells of E. coli. Hardly believable - both in that the EPA would shut down any water treatment facility that allowed that amount of coliforms to be distributed, and that the concentration is high enough to be detectable by the consumer (either by smell or by a slight turbidity).

Regardless of the exact quantities and calculations, I'm with the rest of you - bogus post serving as scare tactic only.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 15 March 2008, 07:20 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is offline
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassist View Post
Allowable quantity of E. coli in tap water (per EPA guidelines when I was in college - since changed in 2007 to allow zero E. coli) = 1 per 100 mL (0.1 liter)
Quoted to emphasize this. Current standards for potable water in New York State, and I believe generally in the US, allow for no detectable E. coli.

There is a good deal of E. coli around, but it's not supposed to be in the drinking water. (Which is not to say that it's guaranteed not to be in any drinking water; things do go wrong, and many people using individual wells haven't had their water tested for years, if ever.)

Most strains of E. coli will do you no harm, and some strains are likely to be doing you good. It's a normal component of the bacteria in the human digestive tract; and having the right bacteria in your digestive tract is good for you. Some of your digestion is actually performed by bacteria, and the presence of beneficial and otherwise-neutral strains in your gut helps keep out the pathogens.

E. coli is tested for in water systems, not because all strains are pathogens (though a few of them are), but because it's a cheap and easy way to test for possible fecal contamination in general; specifically because it's normally found in human (and other animals') intestines. Modern drinking water systems are supposed to be sealed off; a system that isn't properly sealed will almost certainly show this by the presence of E. coli.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 15 March 2008, 09:21 PM
Jay Temple's Avatar
Jay Temple Jay Temple is offline
 
Join Date: 25 September 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 8,532
Default

The lady from the Temperance Union was addressing a group of hillbillies. She poured a glass of water and a glass of whisky. She dropped a worm in each. The worm in the water lived, and the one in the whisky died. She asked, "What does this tell you?"

One of the hillbillies answered, "Drink whisky and you'll never have worms."

Sorry, that's what the OP made me think of.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.