|
|
#121
27 April 2009, 04:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
SIn Chiew's article on re-boiled water......spells danger!
See Attachment in Chinese media. Translated version as follows:- THIS IS NOT NEW DISCOVERY BUT MANY OF US JUST IGNORE IT ALL THE WHILE! A pharmacist report from Singapore that warning people NEVER keep boiling your drinking water!! Report Summary: TOP harmful chemical named (Toxic Nitrate) was produced in water when keep boiling it!! This harmful substance had been proved will increase the chances of intestines cancer and stomach cancer. IF currently you like to use 'WATER DISPENSER with WARM / HOT WATER Functions' or 'Electric AUTO keep warm Thermos' for your convenience, STOP IT NOW otherwise you would suicide yourself slowly as well as your loved one!! NOWADAY, there are so many drinking water company that OFFER FREE WATER DISPENSER when you order drinking water from them! THINK WISELY before you order! YOU might get FREE water dispenser but in fact would be paid out your OWN HEALTH!! PLEASE SEND THIS MESSAGE TO YOUR LOVED ONE, FAMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS AND COLLEAGES to remind them keep away from water dispenser! 
|
|
#122
30 April 2009, 03:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: I've got a doozy for you: my mom has been claiming that pink lightbulbs
are linked with cancer. I scoffed, mentioned SCIENCE!, pointed out that breast cancer support groups adopted the colour pink and haven't spoken out about the Pink Lightbulb Health Menace, etc., but she is not swayed. we're all going to sprout enormous tumours at any moment. I've tried to track this source of this rumour down on my own, because logic isn't getting through to her and she panics when I buy the nice pink bulbs that are so flattering to a lady's skintone (as opposed to harsher full-spectrums).  No joy, so far; probably because this is one urbanlegend that most people are not credulous enough to pass on. FWIW, we both are highly educated folk; she's got a Ph.D. herself, for heaven's sake!
|
|
#124
30 April 2009, 03:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Comment: For many years I have been told that by receiving hickeys can
increase the chances of having skin cancer drastically. Most of the people that I had heard this from were parents and we all know that parents will say things just to keep their children from doing things that the parents do not want them doing. I don't know if this rumor has ever been truncated or not and if it has could you either tell me the results or point me in the direction that I may find them.
|
|
#125
05 May 2009, 04:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Comment: I received an e-mail suggesting that Listerine could help keep
mosquitos away...another respondent said not to use it because Listerine causes cancer. The information I have found links Listerine to cancer only through rinsing (making one more likely to absorb cancer causing agents through the mouth) and is inconclusive on the whole. Would it be safe to use the "Listerine bug repellent," if in fact, it works?
|
|
#126
05 May 2009, 05:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: I read a message board post of a woman who went to a Shaklee
products in-home party and was told this- SAHM's (stay at home moms) have an increased cancer risk because of all the toxic cleaning supplies they are exposed to. Therefore, you should use Shaklee non-toxic cleaning supplies. I Googled it and found this- http://cleveland.momslikeme.com/memb...3260&m=4851281 Sounds like hooey.
|
|
#127
13 June 2009, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
^ Beware the person who tries to sell you something.
Googling "Stay-at-home moms"+cancer reveals that SAHM's might actually have lower incidences of certain cancers due to exercise, but SAHM's don't necessarily have a monopoly on that. A non-biased source I'm all for using more non-toxic products in the house, but why get them from a gods-forsaken MLM when you can get Clorox GreenWorks or Method products in you local grocery store for so much cheaper? - Pseudo_Croat
|
|
#130
28 July 2009, 03:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or else most of suburbia would have it.
|
|
#133
02 March 2010, 03:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Comment: I received an email today, claiming that Princeton University
conducted a lab study where mice were fed from food kept in two separate refrigerators: one, with magnets on the ice box door, and the other without. Food from the icebox with magnets produced an 87% incidence of cancer, as opposed to the mice that were fed from the icebox that did not have any magnets at all. Is this true? Our refrigerator is practically covered with magnets of all shapes and colors.
|
|
#137
31 July 2010, 06:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Comment: I have heard for years now that when a person is operated on to
remove cancer that the cancer spreads like wild fire once oxygen hits it. Is this a true statement? Are there any articles that prove or disprove this statement?
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
