![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- snopes |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
--Logoboros |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Optical Mouse may cause cancer
Believe it or not? Just in case, please be careful. The convenience of using optical mouse eventually coz dangerous side effect. After Three years from the first launch by microsoft, have been found thousand of cases - hands tissue coz by mouse radiation. Optical Mouse works by releasing electromagnetic high frequency to the lower surface under it. This frequency is much more higher than the frequency use for handphone. As it has been known that human hand and wrist contains lot of important nerve connected to brain. According to WHO, the radiation from Optical Mouse is 5 times stonger than using handphone. The radiation is even worse for those product with lower quality ( non branded mouse ), since they use weaker shield to protect customer wrist. WHO, GreenPeace, and CNN have stopped the usage of Optical mouse in their whole office. Meanwhile Microsoft and IBM have allocated 2 billion US Dollar, in joint venture to make a safer pointing device. Big Hardware Industries in China and Taiwan are trying to hide all fact related to this things. While in the market, most of optical mouse sold were coming from their product. To avoid this, try to reduce using mouse. learn how to use hot key ( i.e. Ctrl-V, CTRL-C for paste and copy ) Use back your old model of mouse ( with the tracking ball |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unless an optical mouse were emitting dangerous levels of ionizing radiation (which I doubt), it wouldn't have an effect on cancer rates in users. The main hazard from the radiation given off by optical mice (IR and visible light, IIRC) is heating of tissue, which doesn't cause cancer.
- Pseudo "hate those meeses to pieces" Croat
__________________
The Snopes Initiation Thread - the most fun you can have with sumo wrestlers, a Georgian dance troupe, and a Lickitung and still be legal! |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Can you investigate a rumor we hear again and again? Electric
blankets were found to cause bone cancer and this is the reason we don't see them in retail stores. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
We don't? Since when?
__________________
"Don't get me wrong, it's not a very slippery slope. It's a slope with only a very minor grade, probably flat to the naked eye and which one would need some high quality surveyor's equipment to determine drainage and there's plenty of ways to reroute the flow to greener pastures and such, but a slope toward a bad place nonetheless." -Joe Bentley |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: is this true?
PLEASE MAIL THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW. VERY IMPORTANT! ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE CHILDREN IN YOU LIVES. THE FDA WILL SOON BE TAKING OFF THE SHELVES, ANY SPF PRODUCT OVER A 30. THE REASON IS BECAUSE THE CHEMICALS USED TO MAKE THESE SPF'S ARE PROVEN TO CAUSE CANCER IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS. I FOUND THIS OUT THROUGH MY JOB AT A SKINCARE TRAINING SEMINAR. THE TRAINERS FOR THE PRODUCT I WAS LEARNING ABOUT ARE FROM HUNGARY. THEY ALREADY DO NOT USE THIS CHEMICAL IN ALL OF EUROPE. THE FDA. DOESN'T PLAN ON TAKING THIS ACTION UNTIL 2008, AND THEY WILL MOST LIKELY NOT BE MAKING THE PUBLIC AWARE OF THE ACTION AND THE REASONS BEHIND IT, FOR IT WILL CAUSE A HUGE UPROAR IN THE U.S.. SO PLEASE JUST THROW OUT ALL OF YOUR SUNSCREENS OVER 30 SPF TODAY. I WAS SHOCKED WHEN I HEARD THIS. I HAVE PUT SPF 40-50 ON MY KIDS THROUGHOUT THEIR LIVES TO PROTECT THEM. NOW ANOTHER REASON TO WORRY. TAKE CARE AND GOD BLESS, CC. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- snopes |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
And I'm sure those Hungarian trainers had absolutely no vested interested in getting people to stop using SPF30+ sunscreens, and start using their product, which is, of course, infinitely safer. And I'm sure that the FDA will delay informing the public of a certain cancer risk, creating more cases of cancer, because they fear a "huge uproar".
That said, I don't use chemical sunscreens on my kids. I use only physical blockers containing zinc and titanium. I just don't like the idea of them absorbing more chemicals than strictly necessary. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The above post has been approved by my 'zoo': Bella: Spoiled Cockatiel Princess Mr. Blue: Hyperactive Betta Beauford: Lovable but Bird-brained Dove |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds like someone's decided on a marketing tool - "It(name of product/service) causes cancer!"...
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Make up your sodding mind!
__________________
Your disbelief does not change the nature of reality. - BringTheNoise |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: I was recently told that there may be a link to cancer if using
the gold mesh coffee filter baskets instead of the paper ones. Any truth to this? |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Haha, Ohh man... where to start.
Yes, the energy emitted from the mouse is much higher frequency than that of cellphone emissions. Somewhere in the red area of the visible light range. Microsoft has recently lowered the frequency of their radiation emissions, using infrared. , and has corrected the problems of radiation leakage my replacing the transparent portion of the bottom of the mouse with an opaque housing. ![]() Its a conspiracy, I tells ya! But, not to worry, visible light, and even IR light doesn't cause cancer. M "and you'll pry my optical mouse out of my cold, dead, mutant hands" Raiford Last edited by Guineh; 19 March 2007 at 09:02 PM. |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Now i have been getting told left and right lately that hickies
cause cancer and i wanted to know if this is true or not please send me some feedback i would really appreciate. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder if someone is confusing hickies and petechiae (red spots under the skin caused by broken blood vessels) which can be caused by low platelets and may be a sign of Leukemia. Of course petechiae don't cause the cancer. The cancer indirectly causes the petechiae.
|
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: Last week, I went to a high-end department store (to remain nameless) in
order to buy some perfumed body powder for my grandmother. She's old fashioned and practically bathes herself in perfumed powder every morning after showering. I noticed that only one beauty counter still had boxes of perfumed powder, so I asked if they had more of the powder scented with my grandmother's favorite scent. They said yes - that because that house of perfume was so big and had so many boxes of powder still left, they were trying to continue selling them. But, they added, if I looked around, I would see that none of the other counters sold them anymore. Then they added that this was because talcum powder, a main ingredient in perfumed body powders, had been discovered to be carcinogenic. Rather than buy more, I went on-line to CDC and other sites. The reference I have found imploring people to stop using powders containing talc are all either companies trying to push their own non-talc-containing products or CDC's own study on talcum miners. There was also a political-type action group pushing for a ban on talc. What I could not find was an independent, objective analysis of whether or not talcum powder in high-end women's perfumed body powders actually causes cancer. Before I take away from my 97-year-old grandmother one of the few real pleasures she has left in life, I would like to know. Is it true that there is a cancer danger in these powders, or has it been overblown by groups and companies that have a stake in banning it? Can small amounts used to soften and dry arms and legs really pose a danger, or would you have to snort the stuff to actually be in danger of dieing from it? |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That said, are there any civilizations that have cities and modern agriculture that have little to no grains in their diet? - Pseudo_Croat
__________________
The Snopes Initiation Thread - the most fun you can have with sumo wrestlers, a Georgian dance troupe, and a Lickitung and still be legal! |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comment: For years, I've had the common bad habit of chewing up the inside
of my mouth. I've heard from a number of sources that this could lead to mouth cancer. Is there any truth to this? I never paid much attention to the habit since it is rather common, but the thought that it could lead to cancer is quite the attention getter. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|