![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nine months after back-to-back blizzards brought life to a near-standstill in much of eastern Colorado, some doctors and hospitals say they're seeing one more bit of fallout: lots of babies.
http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/art...om0927-ON.html |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The belief that being shut in during a blizzard causes couples to have sex more often, resulting in a "baby blizzard" nine months later is an old myth.
I remember reading about an anticipated "baby blizzard" in Chicago in October of 1967, nine months after a severe blizzard stalled the city. Newspaper headings would read something like, "Snow Storm Brings Baby Blizzard." It's nothing new. B. A. Rainey |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doesn't that also assume that during blizzards, etc., that people suddenly stop using birth control? Granted, it might be harder to get to condoms, but a lot of people carry condoms around. And if you're on the pill or a hormonal method, then being in a blizzard probably won't make a difference.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've often thought it not so much of a co-incidence that maybe 80% of the people I know from the Isle of Man has a birthday in March, which is nine months after June, which is when they shut the roads for the TT and no-one can get out to do anything. My theory hasn't gained much credence amongst the natives though.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought the idea was more people are stuck together with nothing better to do.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well yeah, that was my idea.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- snopes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are real effects... Most are first time parents. Those with kids already are usually too stressed to screw.....
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's what I thought the idea was, too. But, as I pointed out, people in blizzards ostensibly use birth control, right? Why are they then more likely to conceive kids?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Depending where in Colorado you are, the power does actually tend to go out for somewhat prolonged periods during the really big blizzards. Not so much in the cities, but definitely in the towns further out. And in some specific parts of some cities... my area of Colorado Springs has pretty old construction overall, so even during good weather it's not unheard of to have a couple hour blackout over a few block area. Had one just last week actually lol... first a flicker where the power was out for maybe 5 minutes, then later that day it was out for like an hour.
Course I don't really buy into the whole blizzard babies thing... I think if you're expecting a sudden influx of babies, it'll make normal traffic so to speak look heavier than it really is if that makes sense. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are studies out there that show a "blizzard baby" like effect. I don't have access to them right now. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- snopes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I will see if I can get the wife to look up some of the studies that did find a "baby boom". Not all did, true, but some did. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"You does not need none cigarette, it is abundance of smokin ' above inside" ~~~Ai am in mai prrraime!~~~ |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then the failure rate would go up because more tries, more chances of failure, so the failures per year would go up.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
But how many 'tries' is the standard annual failure rate calculated for?
__________________
"You does not need none cigarette, it is abundance of smokin ' above inside" ~~~Ai am in mai prrraime!~~~ |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
The failure rate (ie. number of failures per 100 acts of intercourse) is unlikely to be affected by the snowstorm/power outage/whatever. The absolute number of failures may be affected if the number of acts of intercourse increases. However, I have yet to see a scientific study that indicates that this is the case.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|