snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > SLC Central > Hurricane Katrina

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17 September 2007, 04:52 PM
hambubba's Avatar
hambubba hambubba is offline
 
Join Date: 30 June 2000
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 10,051
Blow Your Top Many Road Home recipients may have to pay a bunch in taxes

Many Road Home recipients may have to pay a bunch in taxes

Quote:
While the Road Home program has paid out more than 50,000 grant to help hurricane-affected homeowners, many recipients may have to pay back as income tax as much as 35 percent of their grants
Quote:
if Social Security recipients claimed sizable casualty losses and then got large Road Home grants, they may go from not having to file a federal tax return to having to pay taxes on all their income, including their grant and pension.
__________________
"Write injuries in dust, benefits in marble" - fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18 September 2007, 02:59 AM
Sara@home's Avatar
Sara@home Sara@home is offline
 
Join Date: 18 March 2004
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 12,372
Default

Quote:
For example, accountant Jerry Schreiber said that if Social Security recipients claimed sizable casualty losses and then got large Road Home grants, they may go from not having to file a federal tax return to having to pay taxes on all their income, including their grant and pension.
If they didn't have to file because their income was below the exemption/standard deduction they wouldn't have claimed the loss on their taxes because they had no tax to reduce. The people who claimed the loss likely had sufficient income to offset the loss when they claimed it.
__________________
I don't want insurance, I want health care when I need it.

Dyslexic -- can't spell, can't type, can't proofread; I edit a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18 September 2007, 03:01 AM
Four Kitties's Avatar
Four Kitties Four Kitties is offline
snopes minion
 
Join Date: 29 July 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 20,517
Hello Kitty

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sara@home View Post
If they didn't have to file because their income was below the exemption/standard deduction they wouldn't have claimed the loss on their taxes. The people who claimed the loss likely had sufficient income to offset the loss when they claimed it.
I think the "casualty loss" claimed was on insurance policies, not income tax returns.

Four Kitties
__________________
Don't judge: you never know what people are going home to. -- Eileen Mary Fardy (1947-2009)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18 September 2007, 03:09 AM
Sara@home's Avatar
Sara@home Sara@home is offline
 
Join Date: 18 March 2004
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 12,372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Four Kitties View Post
I think the "casualty loss" claimed was on insurance policies, not income tax returns.
I don't think so. The article is discussing taxes and the comments are by an accountant. "Casualty loss" is tax talk, an IRS term, and they are taken on Sch A, Sch D or Form 4684. See Pub 547 or Pub 584.
__________________
I don't want insurance, I want health care when I need it.

Dyslexic -- can't spell, can't type, can't proofread; I edit a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18 September 2007, 03:38 PM
Four Kitties's Avatar
Four Kitties Four Kitties is offline
snopes minion
 
Join Date: 29 July 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 20,517
Hello Kitty

I'll take your word for it -- I pay a professional for that sort of thing for precisely this reason!

Four Kitties
__________________
Don't judge: you never know what people are going home to. -- Eileen Mary Fardy (1947-2009)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.