![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi All:
I received this out of the blue today. Any comments? Quote:
Ieuan "all mail" ab Arthur Last edited by Ieuan ab Arthur; 14 September 2007 at 03:15 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know, this could either be a remonstrance to stop the violence being perpetrated by Muslims against other Muslims and against non-muslims, or it could be a call to forcefully convert all the non-Muslims. One interpretation i would cheer for, and the other would at the least make me cringe. And i have a feeling that those who most need the peaceful interpretation would take it the other way.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is the original Peace-tolerance.com.
He has been sending out emails and messages of this sort for a couple of years. The administrative contact for his domain is "Rehman, Arif" |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
At least someone is speaking out against terrorism and extremist measures. There ought to be more Muslims coming out of their mosques to condemn the activities that give their religion a bad name.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
sounds almost exactly like the last sermon I heard from a fundamentalist christian, just substitute a few names.
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
While it may make them look better in the eyes of the ignorant to do so, why ought they do so?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think there are at least 2 reasons why Muslim leaders aren't often reported as condemning terrorism:
1. There is no Muslim Pope, no one single voice of Islam, so even if local leaders do speak out, its highly unlikely to be carried by national media. If people don't hear it or see it, they rarely know it. Similarly, most of such speeches would be inside of Mosques, and what happens in Mosques is not generally reported on. 2. Many Muslims simply feel no connection whatsoever with the "Muslims" who commit such acts, and feel no need to do anything about it. It's rather like a cousin you never knew going apoplectic and killing 6 people. Though you may appear like you are in a situation to be greatly affected, you aren't. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"By saying that we [Muslims] should go out and condemn the actions it implies that we hold some level of blame, or at least some default suspician just for our faith and more often then that skin color or ethnicity. That we have to "prove" our loyalty where as a non-Muslim does not suggests we are partly at fault and have to apologize." I think that makes alot of sense, at least to me. A Muslim person in America (or abroad) has no more reason to apologize for the extremist terrorists then I do, or President Bush does, they are no more related to the group then anybody else. -MB |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
oh, and plenty of Muslim leaders have condemned terrorism. it's just not reported - peace and tolerance being less sexy than jihad. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is the difference that Bush and Blair were not representing themselves as making their decision because Christianuity required it. They are Christians, but did not claim divine right as authority for their decisions.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dunno 'bout Blair, but Bush said that God wanted him to be president. Therefore, I'd assume that he feels that every decision he makes is the 'correct' one in God's eyes.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
He may, but that is still a very different thing from representing one's actions as demanded by one's religion.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, but Bush obviously made his decisions as an American, and as an American, I feel like I need to applogize to the world for him, even though I voted against him three times (voted in the Republican primary in 2000 'cause there weren't any interesting Democratic races that year)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|