snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > History

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20 August 2007, 06:41 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 75,151
Baseball Warren G. Harding was black

Comment: I'm hearing rumors that Warren G. Harding was Black. This seems pretty
dubious. Have you guys come across any of the emails? (I also heard that
it was discussed on cable TV.)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20 August 2007, 06:57 PM
Eddylizard's Avatar
Eddylizard Eddylizard is online now
 
Join Date: 15 June 2006
Location: Tonbridge, Kent, UK
Posts: 11,682
Default

Yep. It looks like the man just finished a shift down a coal mine, he was that black.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20 August 2007, 07:10 PM
Tootsie Plunkette's Avatar
Tootsie Plunkette Tootsie Plunkette is offline
 
Join Date: 26 October 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 7,600
Squirrel

FWIW, Harding's family tree.
__________________
--Tootsie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20 August 2007, 08:38 PM
Il-Mari Il-Mari is offline
 
Join Date: 27 January 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 2,106
Default

Wow, this is probably one of the oldest still-circulating rumors about a specifc individual:

From the Wikipedia page about the 1920 election:

Quote:
During the campaign, rumors spread that Harding's great-great-grandfather was a West Indian black and that other blacks might be found in his family tree. In response, Harding's campaign manager said, "No family in the state (of Ohio) has a clearer, a more honorable record than the Hardings, a blue-eyed stock from New England and Pennsylvania, the finest pioneer blood."The rumors, perhaps based on no more than local gossip, were circulated by William Estabrook Chancellor. Rumors may have been sustained by an alleged response of Harding to a friendly reporter, perhaps meant merely to be dismissive: "How do I know, Jim? One of my ancestors may have jumped the fence." (Wallechinsky and Wallace, The People's Almanac)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_...ection_of_1920

It's possible that he may have had a black ancestor at some point, which under the 'one drop' principle would have made him 'black' from the point of view of that time period. Other than that, I doubt anyone would consider him 'black' by any widely accepted criteria of today.

- Il-Mari
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20 August 2007, 11:55 PM
Silas Sparkhammer's Avatar
Silas Sparkhammer Silas Sparkhammer is offline
 
Join Date: 22 September 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 25,049
Whalephant

What is going on with the man's skin texture in that photograph? You can't tell much about his skin color, because it looks to me as if he's smothered in a quarter-inch layer of pancake makeup! Is that what is really over his face, or is the texture some sort of artifact of the photographic technology of the time?

Silas (whose pimples are oily to bed and oily to rise)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21 August 2007, 12:02 AM
Elsie's Avatar
Elsie Elsie is offline
 
Join Date: 01 November 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 918
Default

Maybe he was using makeup to cover up his blackness.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21 August 2007, 02:04 AM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 10,193
Ponder

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il-Mari View Post
Other than that, I doubt anyone would consider him 'black' by any widely accepted criteria of today.
You might be surprised. For exmaple, this member of congress, G. K. Butterfield is also a (black, African American) member of the Congressional Black Caucus. (And he's not the only member who looks white.)

So I'm not exactly sure what "widely accepted criteria" you're referring to.
__________________
Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21 August 2007, 03:03 AM
Silas Sparkhammer's Avatar
Silas Sparkhammer Silas Sparkhammer is offline
 
Join Date: 22 September 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 25,049
Whalephant

Quote:
Originally Posted by ganzfeld View Post
. . . So I'm not exactly sure what "widely accepted criteria" you're referring to.
Well, the old standby of the Civil War era -- 1/16th black equals black -- is no longer "widely accepted."

The Jim Crow era also used that as a rough-and-ready rule, but didn't always enforce it because of the large number of descendants of mixed relationships. If everyone who was 1/16th or more black was defined as fully black, an awful lot of people -- many who wouldn't even have been aware of it! -- would have been included.

For some American Indian tribes, a person with 1/16th Indian ancestry is eligible to apply for membership. (I could apply for membership in the Mesa Grande band of the Kumeyaay nation!) But no one goes as far as to declare that anyone who is 1/16th or more American Indian is defined as such.

I don't think there actually is any "widely accepted criterion." I'm not entirely sure how there could possibly be one.

Silas
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21 August 2007, 03:16 AM
A Turtle Named Mack's Avatar
A Turtle Named Mack A Turtle Named Mack is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 4,115
Default

I am impressed with the reported source of the runor, that Harding was asked and said 'Well, maybe some ancestor jumped the fence.' To me, that shows that he really did not care. And I don't see why anyone would, but people keep spreading this stuff like it's a big deal.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21 August 2007, 04:32 PM
Ali Infree's Avatar
Ali Infree Ali Infree is offline
 
Join Date: 02 February 2007
Location: Wheeling, WV
Posts: 1,383
United States

This stuff is a by-product of our slave past complete with lvocabulary like quadroon for someone one-quarter black (ie a black grandparent), octaroon, (one-eighth--one more generation back. And on this terrible history goes.

Then there are the Melungeons. In Wise County, Virginia there were certain families who were considered non-white (ie colored) in their ancestry, regardless of their skin and hair color. Births to these family members were automatically labeled colored or mixed.

At the time of the 1920 election, the Ku Klux Klan was near the height of their power, which extended far from the south--Indiana and southern Illinois being midwestern strongholds for the KKK. Hence the potency of the rumor. Still, Harding's nonchalant, unthreatened answer might have been the highpoint of historic legacy.

Ali "yes, I'll have the oysters" Infree
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21 August 2007, 10:39 PM
Danamac448
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Turtle Named Mack View Post
I am impressed with the reported source of the runor, that Harding was asked and said 'Well, maybe some ancestor jumped the fence.' To me, that shows that he really did not care. And I don't see why anyone would, but people keep spreading this stuff like it's a big deal.

I believe that, as this article suggests, the reason this is currently being spread as a "big deal" has a lot to do with the prospect of Barack Obama becoming president.

Quote:
A friend of mine recently e-mailed me a column from Massachusetts’s Worcester Telegram & Gazette with the arresting title: “Barack Obama Might Not Be First Black President.” Factually, this headline sounds true—if Obama doesn’t start outrunning Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries, he may never reach the presidency. The point of the Telegram & Gazette article, though, was not to speculate about the possible failure of the Illinois senator’s campaign. Its claim is stranger than that. “Barack Obama is campaigning to be the first man with African blood to become president of the United States,” the author writes. “It is a noteworthy aspiration. But even if he is successful, will he be the first to fit that description? Probably not.” The article goes on to argue that Obama will have been preempted by Warren G. Harding, who “is widely credited with having a Negro ancestor, probably a great-grandmother.”
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22 August 2007, 04:01 AM
MapleLeaf's Avatar
MapleLeaf MapleLeaf is offline
 
Join Date: 17 September 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,011
Default

Being a white person who is 1/16 black means you are 15/16 white (or not...but run with me here). And that's pretty damn white, if not eggshell at best. Why would ANYONE say that someone with 1/16 black ancestry was black (in this day and age) other than to point it out as a supposed negative?
__________________
"But that crosses beyond mere pipe dream onto full on watermain fantasy."
-Joe Bentley

Last edited by MapleLeaf; 22 August 2007 at 04:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22 August 2007, 06:21 AM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 10,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Infree View Post
Still, Harding's nonchalant, unthreatened answer might have been the highpoint of historic legacy.
Since more than one person has commented on this, I want to respond: This particular comment was the unsubstantiated response. It seems clear from the substantiated response that he was far from nonchalant. I quote from the quotes in Il-Mari's post:
Quote:
In response, Harding's campaign manager said, "No family in the state (of Ohio) has a clearer, a more honorable record than the Hardings, a blue-eyed stock from New England and Pennsylvania, the finest pioneer blood."
If the "nonchalant" response ever really happened then it appears he either had a witty sense of humor or that it really didn't bother him but, again, that wasn't his campaign's response to the allegation, just what he supposedly said to a reporter when asked.
__________________
Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22 August 2007, 06:24 AM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 10,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MapleLeaf View Post
Being a white person who is 1/16 black means you are 15/16 white (or not...but run with me here). And that's pretty damn white, if not eggshell at best. Why would ANYONE say that someone with 1/16 black ancestry was black (in this day and age) other than to point it out as a supposed negative?
To point it out as a positive?
__________________
Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22 August 2007, 02:29 PM
Ali Infree's Avatar
Ali Infree Ali Infree is offline
 
Join Date: 02 February 2007
Location: Wheeling, WV
Posts: 1,383
Whalephant

As mentioned earlier, American racial politics and social mores generally meant that one drop (any ancestry that was African American, or African) made one Black and therefore a step down on the social pyramid. Racism dictates that black=bad. Not a theory I subscribe to, but still around.

And while I think like to think this is disappearing, it isn't gone. Senator Allen (R-VA)and was found to be of partially Northern African descent (through his French mother, whose ancestry was also Jewish). He practically denied this, although as one wag put it, it made him the first Jewish African American to serve in the US Senate. He lost his re-election bid.

Ali "black is beautiful' Infree
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22 August 2007, 08:39 PM
RealityChuck's Avatar
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
 
Join Date: 14 November 2003
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 1,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Infree View Post
And while I think like to think this is disappearing, it isn't gone. Senator Allen (R-VA)and was found to be of partially Northern African descent (through his French mother, whose ancestry was also Jewish). He practically denied this, although as one wag put it, it made him the first Jewish African American to serve in the US Senate. He lost his re-election bid.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

Just about every candidate for president (at least until the 1960s) had someone claim he was Black. It was the most basic of political smear jobs.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23 August 2007, 11:11 PM
Elkhound Elkhound is offline
 
 
Join Date: 09 October 2002
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 9,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Infree View Post
This stuff is a by-product of our slave past complete with lvocabulary like quadroon for someone one-quarter black (ie a black grandparent), octaroon, (one-eighth--one more generation back. And on this terrible history goes.
I have read in quite serious anthropology texts from the early 20th/late 19th C. the statement 'octaroons do not reproduce.' What that really means, I think, is that after that the black strain in the family is so diluted as not to really matter (assuming that it ever did.)
__________________
"The bicycle is the most civilized conveyance known to man. Other forms of transport grow daily more nightmarish. Only the bicycle remains pure in heart."
--Iris Murdoch
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23 August 2007, 11:14 PM
Elkhound Elkhound is offline
 
 
Join Date: 09 October 2002
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 9,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Infree View Post
This stuff is a by-product of our slave past complete with lvocabulary like quadroon for someone one-quarter black (ie a black grandparent), octaroon, (one-eighth--one more generation back. And on this terrible history goes.
I have read in quite serious anthropology texts from the early 20th/late 19th C. the statement 'octaroons do not reproduce.' What that really means, I think, is that after that the black strain in the family is so diluted as not to really matter (assuming that it ever did.)

(Oh, and we did have a Native American 'one heartbeat away from the Presidency.' VP Dawes was 1/4 Kaw and 1/8 Osage, IIRC [or perhaps the reverse; I haven't the book here.)
__________________
"The bicycle is the most civilized conveyance known to man. Other forms of transport grow daily more nightmarish. Only the bicycle remains pure in heart."
--Iris Murdoch
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 24 August 2007, 04:28 PM
Ravenhull's Avatar
Ravenhull Ravenhull is offline
 
Join Date: 13 September 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 1,903
D'oh!

I was rather amused when I read about how some states had to drop their 'one-drop' policies for an interesting reason. It seems that under such a policy, a large number of Old-money whites would be considered Indian because so many tried to claim they were decended from Pocahontas.

For those of you that aren't familiar with the fun-ness of 'One-drop' mentality, there were (and still are) many who believe that to be caucasian is the epitomy of the human race, and to have even the slightest taint, no matter how many generations back, made you unredeamably un-white.
__________________
"Real patriots ask questions" -- Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan; The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 24 August 2007, 04:35 PM
A Turtle Named Mack's Avatar
A Turtle Named Mack A Turtle Named Mack is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 4,115
Default

Several times when I have felt particularly cantankerous and I have been asked whether I am 'of African ancestry', I have replied 'if you go back far enough.' Some people understand, some see my pale skin and look at me like I'm an idiot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.