snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Legal Affairs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20 June 2018, 05:39 PM
Alarm's Avatar
Alarm Alarm is offline
 
Join Date: 26 May 2011
Location: Nepean, ON
Posts: 5,693
Default Defence lawyer asks sex assault complainant why she didn't clench her legs together

Quote:
A defence lawyer who asked a young woman why she didn't clench her legs together to prevent her father pulling down her pants and having sex with her has been admonished by a Calgary judge, who dismissed a mistrial application Tuesday afternoon.

"You would agree with me then all you had to do was clench your legs together and your pants would have been unable to move," said defence lawyer Krysia Przepiorka in her cross-examination of the young woman late Monday afternoon.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...orka-1.4713403

Where do these people come from that still hold these outrageous, outdated ideas that knees prevent sexual assault?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20 June 2018, 05:52 PM
Ellestar Ellestar is offline
 
Join Date: 31 July 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,816
Default

You know the knee thing could work... for maybe a minute. Those muscles are easily tired.

Not to mention it's those (often weak) muscles against stronger, more utilized arm muscles. Not to mention is those muscles of a woman against the muscles of a man. Not to mention this was the woman's FATHER who she lived with and had other access to her when she was less able (or perhaps more tired) of pressing her knees together.

*insert all the eyeroll emoji*
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21 June 2018, 12:47 PM
Alarm's Avatar
Alarm Alarm is offline
 
Join Date: 26 May 2011
Location: Nepean, ON
Posts: 5,693
Soapbox

Who needs locks on doors or chastity belts when you've got knees?

We should put knees on bank vaults, that would prevent 100% of bank robberies! "I'm sorry, sir, the vault's knees are closed, I cannot enter to withdraw the money you're asking for"

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21 June 2018, 11:16 PM
mbravo's Avatar
mbravo mbravo is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,294
Default

Often it seems the point of this "argument" is to suggest the victim must have wanted the sexual act or else they would have tried harder to prevent it. Suggesting that this girl felt that way about a sexual act with her father gives the statement another layer of vileness.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22 June 2018, 02:15 AM
diddy diddy is offline
 
Join Date: 07 March 2004
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 10,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbravo View Post
Often it seems the point of this "argument" is to suggest the victim must have wanted the sexual act or else they would have tried harder to prevent it. Suggesting that this girl felt that way about a sexual act with her father gives the statement another layer of vileness.
Its a silly argument as you allude to, but I got to wonder why a defense lawyer would bother with it. No judge in his right mind would accept such an argument. I suppose though that a sexist male jury member might still believe in it.

Really though, this defense should be tossed in the ash heap of bad arguments that should result in your being laughed out of court.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22 June 2018, 06:51 AM
crocoduck_hunter's Avatar
crocoduck_hunter crocoduck_hunter is offline
 
Join Date: 27 May 2009
Location: Roseburg, OR
Posts: 12,648
Default

Too many people still believe that kind of crap, unfortunately. It's not a "real" rape unless it meets a bunch of criteria that almost never happen: until then, she was just asking for, wasn't her fault, he was a man who can't be expected to help himself, and so on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22 June 2018, 12:33 PM
Alarm's Avatar
Alarm Alarm is offline
 
Join Date: 26 May 2011
Location: Nepean, ON
Posts: 5,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crocoduck_hunter View Post
he was a man who can't be expected to help himself,
He was her father, so expecting him to restrain himself should have been the lowest of expectations...

Luckily, the judge roundly slapped this question down.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22 June 2018, 04:25 PM
crocoduck_hunter's Avatar
crocoduck_hunter crocoduck_hunter is offline
 
Join Date: 27 May 2009
Location: Roseburg, OR
Posts: 12,648
Default

I was just shotgunning the usual apologia that comes up any time a man is accused of rape.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22 June 2018, 09:51 PM
diddy diddy is offline
 
Join Date: 07 March 2004
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 10,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crocoduck_hunter View Post
Too many people still believe that kind of crap, unfortunately. It's not a "real" rape unless it meets a bunch of criteria that almost never happen: until then, she was just asking for, wasn't her fault, he was a man who can't be expected to help himself, and so on.
Yea. It's really sad that things are that way.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22 June 2018, 09:56 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is online now
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddy View Post
Its a silly argument as you allude to, but I got to wonder why a defense lawyer would bother with it. No judge in his right mind would accept such an argument.
Because people on the jury will still remember it, judge instructions to the contrary. All you need to do is introduce reasonable doubt in one member of the jury. And if it makes her less likely to continue the trial or commit to a second trial, that's good too.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25 June 2018, 02:43 PM
Seaboe Muffinchucker's Avatar
Seaboe Muffinchucker Seaboe Muffinchucker is offline
 
Join Date: 30 June 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 18,632
Glasses

It may also make another victim think twice before going to the police. If you're going to end up crucified in addition to having your life ruined, why bother?

Seaboe
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25 June 2018, 02:57 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is online now
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,097
Default

That is very likely to be a side-effect, but I don't think a defense attorney makes decisions based on how it may affect future, unrelated accusers.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26 June 2018, 07:30 PM
BamaRainbow BamaRainbow is offline
 
Join Date: 09 May 2006
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 956
Default

Quote:
"You would agree with me then all you had to do was clench your legs together and your pants would have been unable to move," said defence lawyer Krysia Przepiorka in her cross-examination of the young woman late Monday afternoon.
And why is there no outrage over the gender of the person making the statement? I can't believe I'm the first person to notice that a WOMAN is the source of this antiquated sexist drivel.

Now, I'm sure if a man had said something similar, there would be nothing but howls of outrage about the "Neanderthal" or "caveman" mentality coming from the guy; in fact, we've seen plenty of cases in the past couple of years where men (including judges) have made similarly stupid sexist comments and they've been raked over the proverbial coals (the judges routinely faced cries of "impeach the bastard") but a "mere" woman says something like this, and apparently it gets a pass.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26 June 2018, 07:59 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is online now
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,097
Default

You mean other than the outrage from everyone posting in this thread and the condemnation from the judge overseeing the trial?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 26 June 2018, 10:10 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is online now
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 9,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaRainbow View Post
And why is there no outrage over the gender of the person making the statement?
The statement is outrageous no matter what the gender is of the person who makes it.

Are you surprised that there are women who believe this sort of nonsense? Of course there are. There are plenty of people -- of all genders -- who want to believe that they, personally, could never be raped -- and who therefore want to believe that there are surefire and easy ways to prevent it. (Although whether Przepiorka actually believes it, or only believes the argument will either cause the jury to disbelieve the accuser or will rattle the accuser to the point at which the rest of her testimony sounds defensive and/or confused, I have no idea.)

Or do you just think that we should somehow think the statement is even worse coming from a woman than from a man? Why would it be?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(Cdn) Federal Court judge under review for berating sex assault complainant Alarm Moot Court 9 05 January 2016 04:54 AM
Luka Magnotta case: The challenges of a 'not criminally responsible' defence Alarm Moot Court 10 12 October 2014 07:33 PM
Air Force sex assault prevention chief charged in sex assault Simply Madeline Police Blotter 9 17 May 2013 06:28 AM
In defence of J Edgar Hoover snopes Crime 1 23 January 2012 04:09 AM
Ex-defence minister joins search for aliens Not_Done_Living Spook Central 5 02 November 2007 09:07 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.