![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space spoiler space that's enough In my novel The Bell, the Book, and the Spellbinder (1997), a character has managed to "stay alive" after his physical death by imprinting his personality and memory into a magical book; the volume has the power of enslaving people who read it, but the youthful hero destroys the book at the last second by dunking it in water and tearing the pages in pieces, and the bad guy dissolves into rivulets of ink. This results in the freeing of a close friend of the young hero from the baleful influence of the book. In Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (1998), a character has managed to "stay alive" after his physical dissolution by imprinting his personality and memory into a magical book; the volume has the power of enslaving people who read it, but the youthful hero destroys the book at the last second by stabbing it with a basilisk fang, and the bad guy dissolves into rivulets of ink. This results in the freeing of a close friend of the young hero from the baleful influence of the book. I don't think that's anything to sue about, but I did find it an interesting happenstance! |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know, Brad, that sounds a bit too much of a coincidence!
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm. Writers plagiarize themselves. I've heard people say that Tennessee Williams actually wrote only one play. He certainly was fond or assigning the same quirks to more than one character. Roman Polanski makes a lot of films about people being random victims of crazy strangers (can't imagine where he got the idea). Shakespeare not only recycled ideas, he recycled lines. In As You Like It, Jacques says that "All the world's a stage," and in The Merchant of Venice, another character says "I hold the world...but a stage." I'm not even sure the idea was original with Shakespeare, anyway.
Were earlier drawing reused, or used as models? Maybe some intermediate-stage arm/leg inkings were reused to save time, but while the movement is the same, the drawings aren't identical. It's not like someone patched together clips from other films, and passed it off as completely new. Since live action films reuse props, sets, and costumes all the time, and unless the Disney advertisements specifically promised "All original art!" I don't see the problem. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In the film world, I see this rather like the reuse of previous film stock. Even Orson Welles did it; in Citizen Kane, when Kane takes a group of people on a picnic, the background in one scene consists of footage from Son of Kong (and you never knew that pterodactyls infested the Florida sky!). Not quite the same, but in Gone With the Wind if you look closely at the background in the "Burning of Atlanta" sequence, you will recognize the Great Wall from King Kong. It was a cheap way to dispose of an old set. Oh--"All the world's a stage": That's a bit of Will Shakespeare cleverness. Shakespeare's stage was the Globe (the world, get it?). And so by what the playwrights of the time called "the old switcheroo," the whole world becomes a stage. Last edited by Brad from Georgia; 08 May 2009 at 10:08 AM. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are correct, sir! In the immortal words of James Cagney, "I never said 'You dirty rat'; what I actually said was 'Judy, Judy, Judy'!" Gotta love a man who can blend to ULs together like that.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Live action" films and TV shows have also re-used footage. If it saves a few bucks, and doesn't distract from the story, it's much ado about nothing.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
One of my sister's favorite Disney films is Robin Hood and we are both very aware of the recycled animation. Whenever we watch it, we always point out the specific scenes.
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Or both authors saw "Evil Dead" in the early '80s.
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Although The Jungle Book, as shown in the video, reused an action sequence from The Adventures of Ichabod And Mr. Toad, and some Mowgli animations were taken from The Sword in the Stone.
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah but the creators of those films and shows don't claim to have the best in quality. Disney is known for being the best in animation so the fact that they reuse and recycle is a bit discrediting.
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, most quality experts define quality as consistency at a desired level. What better way to achive that than to copy the good stuff?
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not me; still haven't seen it, in fact.
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Michael Crichton reused a scene from Jurassic Park in State of Fear. He just traded out the dinosaurs for cannibals.
(Whited out for spoilerness, in case anyone might be upset.) |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Forgive?
![]() Quote:
|
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I noticed that Anita from 101 Dalmatians has the same face as Aurora in Sleeping Beauty. Also in Jungle Book at the beginning you'll see the cubs run into the cave just like how the puppies in 101 Dalmatians head to bed. The exact same movements.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|