snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > SLC Central > Moot Court

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11 March 2016, 05:07 PM
overyonder overyonder is offline
 
Join Date: 03 March 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,049
Default Grand jury does NOT indict man charged in killing teen

http://www.wltx.com/news/local/grand...-teen/76741027

I'm a little puzzled what the jury may have been thinking.

OY
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11 March 2016, 05:23 PM
Steve Steve is offline
 
Join Date: 19 October 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,756
Default

Yeah, I don't get it. Other articles say that he used a Stand Your Ground defense, but from what I can tell (I'm not a lawyer), South Carolina's Protection of Persons and Property Act doesn't cover anything remotely like this. I'm not sure why this didn't go to trial.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12 March 2016, 12:39 AM
Mouse's Avatar
Mouse Mouse is offline
 
Join Date: 10 July 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,106
Mouse

Yeah, I'm kind of curious as well. But maybe the defense managed to convince the jury that the victim was "no angel" and breathed in a manner than his killer could have reasonably found threatening.

I'm more thinking, whenever I heard cases like this, really shooting a gun in a neighborhood? I'm not saying there is never a moment where that's justified, but shouldn't you really exhaust every measure before pulling the trigger? I don't know if anyone's told the NRA, but bullets don't come with Detect Bad Guy settings and they can travel a surprising distance and wind up killing some poor shmoe, whose only crime was being in the flight path of a bullet from a gun fired by a trigger-happy moron.

Maybe I'm being too harsh, but again, given all the risks involved, I feel you should only fire on a burglar if you are backed into a corner and have no other options.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12 March 2016, 02:36 PM
RichardM RichardM is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2004
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 4,118
Default

I'm not sure but I don't think the defense is present in at a grand jury hearing. It seems like the grand jury decided on their own that this was a justified shooting. The prosecutor presented the evidence which may have been as follows: Victim shot in head. Methe admits he fired the shot. Methe's truck was broken into. There is a strong assumption the victim did that without Methe having to testify.

Jury hears this and says that despite what South Carolina law actually says, a person has the right to defend their property.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grand Jury Does Not Charge Ferguson Officer in Michael Brown Shooting E. Q. Taft Police Blotter 67 14 December 2014 03:05 PM
Tattooed-children case moves to Campbell County grand jury A Turtle Named Mack Police Blotter 3 08 April 2014 03:14 PM
Arkansas man charged with killing a 15-year-old prankster firefighter_raven Crash and Burn 4 01 March 2014 01:59 AM
Man Charged With Killing Burleson County Deputy No Billed by Grand Jury A Turtle Named Mack Police Blotter 13 10 February 2014 09:42 PM
Wife of former official charged with murder in Texas DA killing Psihala Police Blotter 1 17 April 2013 10:20 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.