snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > SLC Central > Moot Court

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27 June 2018, 06:13 PM
erwins's Avatar
erwins erwins is offline
 
Join Date: 04 April 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,162
Judge Justice Anthony Kennedy to retire from Supreme Court

Quote:
WASHINGTON — Justice Anthony M. Kennedy announced on Wednesday that he would retire, setting the stage for a furious fight over the future direction of the Supreme Court.

Justice Kennedy, 81, has long been the decisive vote in many closely divided cases. His retirement gives President Trump the opportunity to fundamentally change the course of the Supreme Court.

A Trump appointee would very likely create a solid five-member conservative majority that could imperil abortion rights and expand gun rights.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/u...eme-court.html

NFBSK! I hope he has a good reason, because if not, my opinion of him just fell by a whole lot.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27 June 2018, 06:31 PM
Tantalus Prime's Avatar
Tantalus Prime Tantalus Prime is offline
 
Join Date: 30 March 2007
Location: Baltington, MD
Posts: 97
Default

I certainly hope Sen. McConnell agrees that the replacement nominee should be approved by the Senate elected in the mid-term election that's underway right now.

At least that is what he said eight and a half months before the presidential election, so at the very least the same should apply to the mid-term election that is four and a half months away.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27 June 2018, 06:39 PM
Errata's Avatar
Errata Errata is offline
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 13,154
Default

We're long past the point of giving Republicans the benefit of the doubt. They are not going to hold themselves to any standards of consistency or precedent. It's one rule for them and another for everyone else.

In 2021, the Democratic president and congress needs to play by Republican rules. Reduce wasteful government spending by streamlining the Supreme Court down to 7 members, with a Last In/First Out system. Then reconsider whether that isn't too few, and restore it to 9, with Merrick Garland and one other new appointee.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27 June 2018, 07:03 PM
Cervus's Avatar
Cervus Cervus is offline
 
Join Date: 21 October 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,156
Default

I haven't been this sick with fear for the future of this country since the night of the 2016 election.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27 June 2018, 08:12 PM
E. Q. Taft's Avatar
E. Q. Taft E. Q. Taft is offline
 
Join Date: 30 July 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,194
Default

After the disappointing rulings of the past couple of days, this comes as a real blow. if it's that bad with Kennedy...ugh.

I agree with someone who proposed that the next time the Democrats control the Senate with a Republican in the White House, they should adopt a policy of, "We're reserving one appointment. You stole one from us, we're taking it back."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27 June 2018, 10:20 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is offline
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 9,399
Default

unprintable unprintable unprintable ---

He couldn't at least have waited till after the midterms?

-- story says he announced it after meeting with Trump. Has Trump got something on him, I wonder?

Sorry, I am feeling paranoid right now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08 July 2018, 11:11 PM
Thebobo's Avatar
Thebobo Thebobo is offline
 
Join Date: 10 April 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cervus View Post
I haven't been this sick with fear for the future of this country since the night of the 2016 election.
I haven't been this hopeful since the 2016 election. My expectations are being met.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10 July 2018, 01:26 AM
Sue's Avatar
Sue Sue is offline
 
Join Date: 26 December 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,210
Judge

US President Donald Trump has nominated Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, setting the stage for a bruising confirmation battle.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44775078
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29 June 2018, 03:19 AM
Mouse's Avatar
Mouse Mouse is offline
 
Join Date: 10 July 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,402
Mouse

Quote:
Originally Posted by Errata View Post
We're long past the point of giving Republicans the benefit of the doubt. They are not going to hold themselves to any standards of consistency or precedent. It's one rule for them and another for everyone else.
Exactly. The fact that the DNC continues to pretend that they are dealing with reasonable people, despite all evidence to the contrary, makes you wonder if they are disingenuous or just unbelievably naive. You guys are basically Charlie Brown, always positive that this time Lucy won’t trick you and you’ll get to kick that football, while the GOP is Lucy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29 June 2018, 09:13 AM
gopher's Avatar
gopher gopher is offline
 
Join Date: 06 January 2005
Location: Sunderland, Northumbria, UK
Posts: 2,154
Default

Time for as many sane states as possible to put in place legislation protecting a woman's right to choose and autonomy over her body.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29 June 2018, 12:55 PM
Sooeygun Sooeygun is offline
 
Join Date: 30 May 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,140
Default Is the Trump White House behind Justice Anthony Kennedy's Supreme Court retirement?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8422751.html

Quote:
As he made his way out of the chamber, Mr Trump paused to chat with the justice.

“Say hello to your boy,” Mr Trump said. “Special guy.”

Mr Trump was apparently referring to Mr Kennedy’s son, Justin. The younger Mr Kennedy spent more than a decade at Deutsche Bank, eventually rising to become the bank’s global head of real estate capital markets.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29 June 2018, 04:45 PM
E. Q. Taft's Avatar
E. Q. Taft E. Q. Taft is offline
 
Join Date: 30 July 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
Time for as many sane states as possible to put in place legislation protecting a woman's right to choose and autonomy over her body.
Fortunately I believe that's already on the books here in California, but of course there are plenty of states that have been doing everything they could to make abortion more difficult without banning it outright. If Roe is overturned, they'll be on it like flies on a dog turd.

And it will suddenly make it a much bigger issue in every election (I expect California would get ballot propositions on the matter regularly), which might actually help the Democrats -- I've theorized that there are a fair number of pro-choice Republicans out there who just keep quiet about it, willing to accept the "pro-life" folks in their party as long as they have Roe as a safeguard, but might have to abandon the party if it gets kicked back to legislatures -- but not everywhere, and it will be ugly, and it probably won't be worth it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Justice Gorsuch Joins Supreme Court’s Liberals to Strike Down Deportation Law thorny locust Soapbox Derby 5 20 April 2018 02:14 PM
Supreme Court rules states must allow same-sex marriage TallGeekyGirl Soapbox Derby 60 13 July 2015 07:59 AM
Supreme Court favors corporations snopes Politics 0 01 July 2014 10:58 PM
Supreme Court will take up new health law dispute Psihala Soapbox Derby 23 27 November 2013 08:44 PM
Justice Clarence Thomas breaks seven-year silence in court snopes Moot Court 0 14 January 2013 07:17 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.