snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Spook Central

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26 February 2007, 11:29 AM
Stoneage Dinosaur's Avatar
Stoneage Dinosaur Stoneage Dinosaur is offline
 
Join Date: 19 August 2005
Location: Fraserburgh, Scotland
Posts: 2,559
Default Nessie's English cousin

Bowness Monster

Quote:
It is little more than a dark smudge near the surface of a lake - but it could still signify the birth of a new legend.

For this shadowy image is causing more than a ripple of interest among monster aficionados.

And to the man who took it, the picture is proof that something strange lurks in the waters of Windermere.
Could this be the feeblest attempt yet at creating a rival for the Loch Ness Monster?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26 February 2007, 11:36 AM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is online now
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,023
Default

As usual they say it looked "huge" and about 50 feet long compared to nearby boats, but there's nothing in the rather blurry picture to give a scale. Whatever's making the wake looks much smaller than that to me. If it had a head like a labrador, then perhaps it was a labrador?

Quote:
Aware of similar sightings in the lake, he began taking pictures of what he calls the "Bowness Monster".

"When I looked at them on my computer I realised I had something," he said. "It was spine-tingling."

...

His wife, 38, said: "I was just making excuses in my head for what it could be but when we saw the pictures we knew we had seen something really important."
Huh? If they showed the best picture in the article, then it's hardly that exciting... what about the pictures made them think it was so important?

Quote:
Dr Charles Paxton, a Marine Biologist from St Andrews University in Edinburgh, said: "A fish or a water mammal would not be that big and deer would not go under the water."

He said that new species of water creatures are often discovered, so he "wouldn't rule out any possibilities".
It's quite unusual for new 50 foot long species to be discovered, though, let alone in a smallish lake that's been well-used by humans for centuries. That seems an odd thing for a marine biologist to say. I wonder how much context they gave him.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26 February 2007, 12:38 PM
Jay Tea Jay Tea is offline
 
 
Join Date: 09 October 2002
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 13,909
Icon605

There is quite a bit of marine life unique to the Lakes but that picture is pathetic it really is - at least there is a tiny bit of theatre about all the Nessie crap, but this is just a dark smear indeed.

Oh, and you weren't '1000ft up a mountain', you were 300 metres up a hill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26 February 2007, 12:47 PM
Hans Off's Avatar
Hans Off Hans Off is offline
 
Join Date: 14 May 2004
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 4,530
Default

I like that, they witnessed it, first hand, with their own eyes...

And only got excited when they looked at the pictures?

WTF?

I think these people are thick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26 February 2007, 12:54 PM
Victoria J
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard W View Post
If it had a head like a labrador, then perhaps it was a labrador?
What sort of warped thinking is that ?

You should be ashamed of yourself.

It is obviously a sign that it is a monster with the head of a labrador, the body of an alligator and the tail of a sea otter.

Victoria J
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26 February 2007, 01:13 PM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is online now
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria J View Post
What sort of warped thinking is that ?

You should be ashamed of yourself.

It is obviously a sign that it is a monster with the head of a labrador, the body of an alligator and the tail of a sea otter.

Victoria J
Yeah, sorry. I should know better than to jump to unwarranted, unsupported conclusions. But let's face it, from their incredibly exciting picture it could just as well be a duck.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26 February 2007, 01:14 PM
Troberg Troberg is offline
 
 
Join Date: 04 November 2005
Location: Borlänge, Sweden
Posts: 11,580
Default

Definately not a monster. Anything large would create a larger bow wave and more noticeable wake. What you see in the photo is the entire body, there is no huge body under that head. I'd guess beaver or otter or something else of that size that happens to live in the area. Or a fox with mange.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26 February 2007, 02:35 PM
Ryda Wong, EBfCo. Ryda Wong, EBfCo. is offline
 
Join Date: 14 December 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 24,025
Default

Y'all got water snakes? Cause that's what it looks like to me.....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26 February 2007, 02:54 PM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is online now
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryda Wong, EBfCo. View Post
Y'all got water snakes? Cause that's what it looks like to me.....
Grass snakes swim, but they're rarely more than a couple of feet long. I've seen one swimming across a river, and it did hold its head up like a little nessie.

I don't think the picture is clear enough to say it "looks like" anything though - other than that I doubt even the tree trunks in the background are as much as 50ft tall (they look like silver birch; that site gives 25m or about 80ft as a maximum overall height, and they don't seem especially large ones from the picture), and whatever's swimming is both nearer and much smaller than them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04 March 2007, 07:23 AM
Lambda Lambda is offline
 
Join Date: 15 December 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 513
D'oh!

Quote:
Dr Charles Paxton, a Marine Biologist from St Andrews University in Edinburgh, said: "A fish or a water mammal would not be that big and deer would not go under the water."
It's good to see they've given this piece to a reliable journalist. There's a good clue in the name as to where Dr Paxton works.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05 March 2007, 04:04 AM
FullMetal FullMetal is offline
 
Join Date: 19 December 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,376
Default

looks like a beaver or muskrat...

they both dive, and disappear for a while...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05 March 2007, 09:57 AM
Andrew of Ware's Avatar
Andrew of Ware Andrew of Ware is offline
 
Join Date: 22 April 2003
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 8,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FullMetal View Post
looks like a beaver or muskrat...

they both dive, and disappear for a while...
Unless they have been introduced very recently beavers don't live in Lake Windermere. They became extinct in England hundreds of years ago, but I believe they have been re-introduced in some places recently.

BBC story from 2005

I do not think muskrats have ever lived in England. (Apart from a song called 'Muskrat Love' I know nothing about them.)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05 March 2007, 11:19 AM
Jay Tea Jay Tea is offline
 
 
Join Date: 09 October 2002
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 13,909
Icon23

I don't think swamprat was ever introduced to the UK but they are a common pest on the continent. Easily trapped and very tasty - use the meat to augment dehydrated meal packs
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05 March 2007, 03:43 PM
Rshady
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC report View Post
The beaver was hunted almost to extinction for its fur and the pain-relieving properties of its anal gland secretions.

I couldn't stop laughing at that last bit, imaginie being hunted and wiped out for your Anal Gland secretions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.