snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Entertainment

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23 June 2012, 06:18 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 109,619
Icon84 The Filthiest Joke Ever Hidden in a Children's Movie

Comment: Is this true?

http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/t...ildrens-movie/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23 June 2012, 06:46 AM
rockland6674's Avatar
rockland6674 rockland6674 is offline
 
Join Date: 28 December 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,111
Default

Quote:
Anthony Scibelli is a handsome stand-up comedian and comedy writer.
Nope, no chance that this article is a joke. No chance at all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23 June 2012, 07:01 AM
fitz1980 fitz1980 is offline
 
Join Date: 27 May 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,625
Default

Roald Dahl really did write an raunchy adult book called "My Uncle Oswald in 1979." But both the book "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" and the movie adaptation "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" predate the publication of that book.

Hence it's not a dirty joke slipped into a kids' film. It's use in "My Uncle Oswald" is a dirty reference to a fictional fruit name that he created years earlier & and I believed used in at least one other story.

Plus even in-universe it could make sense. People use food items as slang terms for "private parts" all of the time in the real world. Melons, bananas, clams, huevos (the Spanish word for eggs, but in slang terms also means testicles.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24 June 2012, 02:30 AM
RealityChuck's Avatar
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
 
Join Date: 14 November 2003
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 1,369
Default

Dahl wrote as bunch of adult stories (which are far superior to his children's books); My Uncle Oswald is an expansion of his story "Bitch."

But it's not a dirty joke; Charlie and the Chocolate Factory predated My Uncle Oswald by a couple of decades. "Snozzleberries" seems to have been made up for Charlie; at most, Dahl is making a sly reference to the children's book many years later.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24 June 2012, 10:49 AM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 25,075
Default

Why does he need to point out a fanciful later meaning of "snozzberry" anyway, when the script itself has the children licking plums and bananas?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25 June 2012, 06:31 PM
Gutter Monkey's Avatar
Gutter Monkey Gutter Monkey is offline
 
Join Date: 13 December 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,430
Default

Just because one character uses the word 'snozzberry' as a euphemism for a penis doesn't mean that every use of that word is also euphemistic. There's a whole bunch of slang terms for penises that are otherwise perfectly normal words and even foodstuffs: weiner, meat, noodle, frank n' beans, etc..

If you swap in a new word then the quotes become "The meat tastes like meat!" and "I grabbed him by the meat," so yeah, that article is really reaching.

But I can see his point, it was a sly dig from Dahl.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26 June 2015, 04:07 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 109,619
Roll eyes

Comment: A web search for the correct spelling of "snozzberries" resulted
in hits that were almost in entirety in reference to the use of this word
in Willy Wonka as a hidden dirty joke.

According to the top set of results, the word snozzberry is a reference to
the male sexual organ.

I personally find this difficult to believe of those times. Perhaps this a
backwards projection of a meaning of the word created at a later date,
onto the movie?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26 June 2015, 04:41 PM
crocoduck_hunter's Avatar
crocoduck_hunter crocoduck_hunter is offline
 
Join Date: 27 May 2009
Location: Roseburg, OR
Posts: 11,146
Default

You know, when I was a kid watching that movie, I thought snozzberry was a euphemism for booger.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29 June 2015, 06:50 AM
Dasla's Avatar
Dasla Dasla is offline
 
Join Date: 15 April 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,301
Default

Sometime a cigar is just a cigar.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29 June 2015, 05:35 PM
Dr. Winston O'Boogie's Avatar
Dr. Winston O'Boogie Dr. Winston O'Boogie is offline
 
Join Date: 23 February 2000
Location: Fox Lake, IL
Posts: 5,083
Default

I thought the dirties reference hidden in plain sight was from Leave it to Beaver.....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17 August 2015, 09:06 PM
Dannycrat Dannycrat is offline
 
 
Join Date: 17 August 2015
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1
Whalephant

Quote:
"Not exactly a eunuch then."

"It didn't look like it."

"How did you manage to roll the old rubbery thing on him?"

"There's only one way when they get violent," Yasmin said. "I grabbed hold of his snozzberry and hung onto it like grim death and gave it a twist or two to make him hold still."

"Ow."
"Very effective." "I'll bet it is."

"You can lead them around anywhere you want like that."

"I'm sure."

"It's like putting a twitch on a horse."
From Page 141 of Roald Dahl’s “My Uncle Oswald”.



The Cracked humor article can be labelled as unconfirmed (unconfirmable) but possible.

The quote is, as quoted above, in and of itself a real part of the story.


What can NOT be confirmed is Roald Dahl’s intent.


His books are filled with sly humor and nonsense (as this too can be labeled) that might mean something to him or be a part of the whimsy.


It’s completely possible he was making a funny reference to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory using the term ‘snozzberry’ as a euphemism for penis. As we do in modern day, real-world situations as well.



It is likely it was not intended to mean ‘penis’ in the original story



In a story that is literally about drugging powerful men and sleeping with them in 1979 (Willy Wonka was published in 1964) it can be assumed to be a product of the times. During the 70’s such behavior was not seen as rape and it would be simplistic to retroactively term it so (though of course completely right to term it as morally wrong).


‘Snozz’ is also a commonly used slang term for ‘Nose’ which probably identified it originally as simply being a nasty tasting fruit for the kids to taste in “Willy Wonka”, probably equal to naming it “Snot”berry.

Dahl uses other whimsical ways of describing things, going out of his way to call condoms “Rubbery things” throughout the whole of “My Uncle Oswald”. It isn’t a huge leap to then name male genitalia after a nasty tasting fruit because it made him chuckle, or floored with a self-reference.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20 August 2015, 08:56 PM
Spud Sabre Spud Sabre is online now
 
Join Date: 27 October 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crocoduck_hunter View Post
You know, when I was a kid watching that movie, I thought snozzberry was a euphemism for booger.
That's what I thought too.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21 August 2015, 12:44 AM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 25,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dannycrat View Post
It is likely it was not intended to mean ‘penis’ in the original story
It seems from that quote that he did mean it as "penis" or "testicles" in that context, but also that it was already an in-joke of his from some other context that, as you say, we shall no doubt never know. In the various Willy Wonka books, it's still less of a euphemism than the name Willy Wonka is in English English...

No doubt Roald Dahl was sometimes making private jokes, but so is every writer, even childrens' writers.

(eta) Coincidentally, my friends told me off earlier because I'd apparently shouted "penis" too loudly in the pub. I don't say these things out of context, so perhaps I was just talking too loudly in general. I do that sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21 August 2015, 02:11 AM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is offline
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard W View Post
it's still less of a euphemism than the name Willy Wonka
Oh, good grief.

I never thought of that, obvious as it is. And now I don't suppose I'll ever be able to unthink it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22 August 2015, 06:28 AM
UEL's Avatar
UEL UEL is offline
 
Join Date: 01 August 2004
Location: Ottawa/Fredericton, Canada
Posts: 8,555
Baseball

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard W View Post
(eta) Coincidentally, my friends told me off earlier because I'd apparently shouted "penis" too loudly in the pub. I don't say these things out of context, so perhaps I was just talking too loudly in general. I do that sometimes.
What? You? Loud in the pub? You don't say.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most disturbing children's book Not_Done_Living Fauxtography 33 29 July 2009 11:15 PM
Children's Bill of Rights (Poem) hambubba Inboxer Rebellion 18 18 March 2009 07:49 AM
Did McCain tell this joke? snopes Questionable Quotes 22 24 July 2008 02:30 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.