snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > Techno-Babble

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09 September 2014, 08:01 PM
A Turtle Named Mack's Avatar
A Turtle Named Mack A Turtle Named Mack is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 21,445
Icon103 EPA Takes on the Oyster/Acidification Scaremongers

The "evil twin of global warming", ocean acidification caused by increasing carbon dioxide, is killing billions of oysters in Northwest waters. Major media gave it lots of play, with the Seattle Times producing a glossy series centered around the oyster carnage.Even the New York Time recently gave it front page coverage. But there was a problem. It really wasn't true. There is no evidence that ocean acidification is damaging oysters in Puget Sound or other local waters. Who says so? The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Washington.

http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/0...ification.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10 September 2014, 12:27 AM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 22,941
Cheer

That's good news for two reasons. One, oysters aren't in as bad a predicament as feared. Two, the EPA is recognized as a reliable arbiter of science-based policy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10 September 2014, 02:04 PM
Seaboe Muffinchucker's Avatar
Seaboe Muffinchucker Seaboe Muffinchucker is offline
 
Join Date: 30 June 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 17,360
Glasses

Quote:
Originally Posted by ganzfeld View Post
Two, the EPA is recognized as a reliable arbiter of science-based policy.
[conspiracy] Don't you believe it. EPA is a branch of the federal government, the government is run for the sole benefit of the 1%, therefore any study the EPA so much as cites has to have been falsified to hide the truth. [/conspiracy]

Sadly, I know a number of people who believe that, even though they are not normally conspiracy buffs. Once they settle on an environmental belief, all the science in the world can't convince them their positions are wrong. And these are people who pride themselves on their open-mindedness and admiration for science.

Seaboe
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10 September 2014, 02:16 PM
UEL's Avatar
UEL UEL is offline
 
Join Date: 01 August 2004
Location: Ottawa/Fredericton, Canada
Posts: 8,567
Baseball

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaboe Muffinchucker View Post
And these are people who pride themselves on their open-mindedness and admiration for science.
This is exactly what I find. People that are strong adherents to science in one discipline (global climate change) but willing to reject all the science produced in other disciplines (vaccines or GMO foods).

I'm a proponent of "you can't have it both ways". I get the shoulder then.

If their rejections were more nuanced, for example with GMO foods and worrying about contaminating existing gene stocks in the wild, I'd be OK. But it is usually the broad "GMO is wrong and should be banned" argument that I hear.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Victim takes would-be mugger to dinner snopes Glurge Gallery 3 28 February 2014 11:41 PM
FDA takes another look at caramel coloring in soda snopes The Bad Gastronomer 2 24 January 2014 02:05 AM
Boy, 4, takes loaded gun to day care snopes Police Blotter 0 08 June 2013 06:51 AM
Lebanon chef finds 26 pearls in single oyster snopes Trivia 6 26 September 2008 12:33 AM
Oyster man's Google-gram was a hoax snopes Computers 0 06 June 2007 08:49 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.