snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > The Bad Gastronomer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 12 October 2017, 06:51 AM
Dasla's Avatar
Dasla Dasla is offline
 
Join Date: 15 April 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildaBeast View Post
A few years ago I read somewhere (or possibly heard on NPR) in one of the numerous stories about how millennials are different from older generations that supposedly millennials are more likely to be swayed by a label indicating the presence of a positive thing (Such as "Good source of protein!") as opposed to one indicating the absence of a negative thing (Like "Fat free!"). So maybe that attitude is changing.
Personally I see no difference. You should look at the product as a whole and not only just what is in there or what isn't in there.

Good source of protein? but how much fat or sugar is in there, and do you need more protein?

Fat free ok but how much sugar is in there and does it have any nutritious value?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12 October 2017, 12:34 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is offline
 
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7,856
Default

And do you actually need it fat free? An entirely fat free diet would make you pretty sick.

You need to be looking not only at the product as a whole, but at the overall diet as a whole.

But I meant, also, that, say, 'oatmeal, dried apricots, honey' or for that matter 'oatmeal, corn syrup, glucose, sucrose, molasses, honey, as few dried apricots as we could get away with and still have them on the label' is often in tiny print somewhere on the back of the label, while "FAT FREE" is in huge print on the front.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12 October 2017, 02:58 PM
Darth Credence's Avatar
Darth Credence Darth Credence is offline
 
Join Date: 28 October 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,237
Default

I'm with Dasla - it will just change how advertisers deceive, not whether they will. Now, they can get away with saying "fat free" for something that is basically pure sugar and would never have fat. If people become less likely to care about what it doesn't have, and goes with what it does have, they can change it to "natural source of energy", and still just be sugar.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12 October 2017, 03:03 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is offline
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 73,368
Default

In addition to the questions Dasla mentioned, how does the food into your overall diet that day/week?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You've got to love Bostonians snopes Inboxer Rebellion 15 21 May 2013 04:54 AM
If you love your MOM, forward this now MissBethiepoo Glurge Gallery 32 27 February 2008 03:59 PM
For my Love Class Bravo Glurge Gallery 13 08 November 2007 02:04 AM
Cardboard is main ingredient in Beijing steamed buns snopes Food 22 13 August 2007 07:31 PM
I love you burymeinblack Glurge Gallery 17 07 May 2007 12:31 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.