![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kallah, one's very first apartment often proves to be an education - prior to it, so many things are taken for granted.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
One of the first things one often does when they get home is want to use the bathroom. We were quite annoyed the previous owners took every scrap of toilet paper in the house when they left. It's not like we were expecting full rolls in each bathroom, but surely they didn't run out in four bathrooms perfectly just before moving out. They would have had to make special effort just to remove partial rolls. It seemed petty.
When we move, I definitely will leave toilet paper behind. The thing that has caused real problems, though, is they didn't leave behind extra paint from when they last painted (indoor or outdoor). We had to repaint the outside since we moved in, so at least we have touch-up paint there now. I'm not in love with the color they painted the whole inside, but it's still in too good of shape to want to go through the expense and hassle of painting the entire place. There are places we've moved installed shelves, or had minor wall damage, where it would be nice to cover the white spackle. Even though they're really good, and we took a decent sized cut-out from a painted wall to be color matched, Sherwin Williams hasn't been able to recreate the color to the point a patch of touch-up won't show up on the wall. So, for heavens sake, especially if your walls aren't white, leave touch-up paint for the new owners. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't leave toilet paper, I consider it a part of the moving out cleanup to remove such items. Who would want second hand hygiene items?
As for touch-up paint (and wallpaper, carpet bits and so on), I leave it if I have it. I seldom have touch-up paint, though, as I keep painting until I'm out of paint. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why not? "Second-hand" doesn't necessarily mean "used."
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
He may be doing a second/third coat on the room he already painted rather than moving down the hallway until he runs out.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm curious, why do you consider left-behind toilet paper to be a second-hand hygiene item? It's no different than any other roll you'd use at someone's house or a public toilet. That reminds me, another thing that people often don't think about getting until they need one is a toilet plunger. When I rented, I knew that maintenance would come unclog a toilet if I needed it, but I considered that too embarrassing to call them about. Also, if you only have one bathroom and it's late at night, it's better to just have a plunger on hand than to have to track down a maintenance guy and wait for them. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regarding toilet paper, I was the last person to move out of my dorm suite when I was moving into my apartment, so I, uhh, helped myself to a few rolls from the dorm bathroom. Since this house was a foreclosure, all the rules about what items stay and what the last occupants took with them pretty much went out the window. Strangely enough they left the shower curtain (a rather nice decorative one, too) but they took the light fixture from the bathroom. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When I sell this place and move out, I'm taking certain fixtures and cover plates with me, but that's only because they're decorative and/or special. I'll replace them with generic ones for the next owners, though. For example, when I redid both bathrooms I put in new showerheads, but all I could find were the new low-flow kind. The showerhead I use is the old kind that actually uses lots of pressure and is like spraying yourself with a hose (I like that). So I'm going to take that with me wherever I live and then just replace it with one of the newer (wimpy in comparison) models when I move out. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Make sure that you either replace those things when people view that house, or specify in the contract that those things will be removed and replaced by you. Not sure about the US (and it probbaly varies by state as well) but here, the standard Real Estate contract states that anything that is a fixed part of the house when the contract is completed stays in the house, with the exception of anything listed on the contract. Anything removed by the seller (even if it is replaced with a variant) can be grounds for a complaint from the buyer, and even cancelling the contract.
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Me too. I don't want to be gently rained on.
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
When we bought our house, it had been vacant for 2 years since it was foreclosed on. Every room has multiple ceiling or wall fixtures - and there were zero bulbs. I think we needed 60+ bulbs (the master bathroom vanity alone is 10). The previous owners also took bookcases from the living room, and the carpeting only went up to where the cases stood. Most outlet covers were missing. Our Christmas list for our family that year was lightbulbs, outlet covers, and smoke detectors.
I originally thought they'd also taken the remote for the ceiling fan in the dining room, but I found waaaaay back in a kitchen cabinet when I was putting in shelf paper. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's what my contract says:
Quote:
Honestly, the house was in such bad condition that my plan was to renovate and replace practically everything anyway, so at the time it wasn't an issue for me. |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I had this explained to me in detail by my real estate agent when buying and selling - and that buyers will often ask for (and receive) permission to take pictures of the house they have bought, so that they can consider redecorating, the best arrangement of their furniture, etc. They also do it to prove that the "real property" of the house is unchanged. This may be specific to region - i.e. Canada or Ontario vs. each US state - but I was told to expect things to be unchanged as a buyer, and warned not to change them as a seller. The extension of the argument over what is (and isn't) mentioned specifically - as you quote it - can be taken to some really absurd conclusions. If the cover plates can go, why not the outlets? If they light fixtures can go, why not the wires? Why not the sink, or the internal doors? The blanket definition of "real property" was things which were affixed or installed. Area rugs could go - carpet glued or nailed down could not. I remember some specific literature on window coverings but generally I was told that as a buyer I should ensure that they are included in my offer. And this is also subjective on what was, or was not, in the house at the time of the offer. I suppose that a buyer could make their offer conditional upon the seller putting in some basic window coverings, if there weren't any at the time of showing, but it's usually better to adjust the value of the offer accordingly. Now in these days of bank-owned and short-sale homes, there really isn't much to worry about the seller taking anything of "value" between making the offer and closing, because it is usually all gone. I bought a bank-owned house here in the US with a broken window and was told by the seller that they wouldn't consider making the repair of said window a condition of purchase. In other words, it was one of the "as-is" conditions. But by the same token, the house was explicitly offered for sale with a stove to fulfill some type of requirement for a HUD-sponsored loan, and they could not change out or remove the stove between the time the offer was made, and the closing. I think that the law would generally be upon the side of the buyer who was sold something under such conditions of fraud, especially if it results in lower value. Let's face it - a cheap electrical cover plate does its job just as well as a fancy one, but the fancy one is worth more. |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But whatever. I'll replace my personal stuff with generic fixtures when I'm getting ready to put the house on the market. I didn't mean to imply that I'd like, stealthily sneak away with the ceiling fan blades the morning of the closing or something. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is 'momnesia' a real condition or an urban myth? | Canuckistan | Medical | 13 | 17 July 2010 11:26 AM |
| Godless Coins Real or Just an Urban Myth? | snopes | Snopes Spotting | 0 | 17 October 2008 03:17 AM |
| People who confuse song lyrics with real life | snopes | We've Got Mail | 7 | 19 September 2007 02:36 PM |
| Real-life urban legend: Woman says assailant hid in her SUV | snopes | Crime | 0 | 14 September 2007 04:11 PM |
| A real-life mystery: The hunt for the lost Leonardo | snopes | History | 1 | 15 February 2007 10:51 AM |