snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > Police Blotter

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 21 June 2013, 09:23 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is online now
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 25,947
Default

Then use your freeze ray on them and you'll have all the time you need for a lengthy musical number.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21 June 2013, 10:16 PM
Alchemy Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: 05 March 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Pink Pill View Post
Can we still call it a Death Ray Gun?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Turtle Named Mack View Post
Obviously I have not kept up with tech developments in this area. I am guessing I am at least 30-40 years behind on this
Closer to 120 years.

X-rays are, by definition, produced through electronic transitions. There's a range where you can produce x-rays (from electronic transitions) and gamma rays (from nuclear transitions) of the same energies (the region between hard x-ray and gamma, around 100 keV). But the x-ray sources we're talking about here are based on Cu (or possibly Al) core electrons, 8 and 14 keV, respectively.

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Turtle Named Mack View Post
Would such a method of generating x-rays be used in modern equipment? It seems much safer if you can just use a high-voltage x-ray generator w/ no radioactive materials involved to do so, whether for imaging or radiotherapy. OTOH, it might be cheaper and in a way more reliable (no dependence on reliable electricity) in undeveloped areas to use radioactive materials, despite the risks.
Good question.

Gamma rays are used for imaging by generating them within the body to be imaged and then detecting them outside the body. But as an "x-ray" image they're pretty useless; the adsorption cross-section of bone and soft tissue are pretty near indistinguishable at such high energy. Gamma rays just aren't produced at energies low enough for this purpose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Turtle Named Mack View Post
Are cathode-ray tubes capable of being juiced up to the million eV level, or do they run into limitations based on the electron binding energy around the target atoms?
The latter - binding energy goes up with atomic number but you'll hit the end of the periodic table at around 100 keV. And well before that you'd be using targets that were unstable and naturally giving off gamma. If you want to stick with a CRT without any radioactive material, you'd pretty much max out at using a lead target and recovering x-rays at 73 keV. (Assuming you could build such a device.)

Producing x-rays in the ~100 keV range (that is, without a radioisotope) is possible but requires something more exotic than a CRT, such as a synchrotron or a free electron laser.

Last edited by Alchemy; 21 June 2013 at 10:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 22 June 2013, 12:06 AM
Little Pink Pill's Avatar
Little Pink Pill Little Pink Pill is offline
 
Join Date: 03 September 2005
Location: California
Posts: 7,055
Cheer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Yes.
That seriously made my week.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sharpen your scissors with foil snopes Inboxer Rebellion 1 15 January 2013 10:51 PM
Anti-Muslim e-mail perpetuates lie inherent in bigotry snopes Snopes Spotting 5 18 August 2010 04:34 PM
Aluminum foil locking tab snopes Inboxer Rebellion 1 25 May 2008 11:20 PM
A salute to Denmark (very long anti immigrant/Muslim rant) BrianB Inboxer Rebellion 11 10 March 2008 08:00 PM
New Fashion for Tin-Foil Hat Wearers TrekkerScout Spook Central 2 28 April 2007 08:13 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.