snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > NFBSK

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31 October 2013, 08:11 PM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 109,624
Glasses Pedophilia now an orientation instead of a disorder

Comment: Pedophilia Officially Classified as Sexual Orientation by
American Psychiatric Association. Is this real?

http://www.charismanews.com/us/41571...gy-association

There are many posts/remarks going back and forth on whether this is real
or not but I have not been able to find anything solid on this. I'm hoping
this is not the case and that this is some sort of troll.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31 October 2013, 08:32 PM
Wolf333's Avatar
Wolf333 Wolf333 is offline
 
Join Date: 12 August 2006
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 3,205
Default

New facts!


Just the AFA talking out of their butts again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31 October 2013, 08:54 PM
A Turtle Named Mack's Avatar
A Turtle Named Mack A Turtle Named Mack is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 21,445
Default

Not really. The follow-up shows that 'pedophilia' under that name has been recognized as an orientation and that pedophilic disorder is when one does not or cannot stop oneself from acting on that orientation. AFA did not give the full context and probably did not have it, but just got the basic info and issued its report. Yeah, it would be nice if reporters got the full context of the stories they post, but this is very common throughout the media.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31 October 2013, 09:14 PM
Wolf333's Avatar
Wolf333 Wolf333 is offline
 
Join Date: 12 August 2006
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 3,205
Default

That's a really round about way to say the the AFA was talking out of its butt again.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31 October 2013, 09:18 PM
erwins's Avatar
erwins erwins is offline
 
Join Date: 04 April 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,457
Default

Does the DSM define sexual orientations? Because the follow up I see just says they changed the name to pedophilic disorder to standardize the nomenclature, that it was an editorial change, not a change in criteria. It seems that people are deducing from that bit of grammar change that that means that DSM is somehow recognizing something they didn't before. I don't think there's any evidence of that yet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31 October 2013, 09:22 PM
Lainie's Avatar
Lainie Lainie is offline
 
Join Date: 29 August 2005
Location: Suburban Columbus, OH
Posts: 73,498
Default

No, the DSM does not define orientations, because they are not disorders or diseases.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31 October 2013, 09:45 PM
erwins's Avatar
erwins erwins is offline
 
Join Date: 04 April 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,457
Default

That's what I thought.

This:
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Turtle Named Mack View Post
Not really. The follow-up shows that 'pedophilia' under that name has been recognized as an orientation and that pedophilic disorder is when one does not or cannot stop oneself from acting on that orientation. AFA did not give the full context and probably did not have it, but just got the basic info and issued its report.
is flat wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31 October 2013, 11:15 PM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 23,110
Default

There may be some truth to it. I'm not saying it's likely but it's within the realm of possibility that the AFA is unable to use Google due to being too stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31 October 2013, 11:31 PM
Avril's Avatar
Avril Avril is offline
 
Join Date: 07 August 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 10,504
Default

What I don't get is that the language that describes what is wrong with the person is exactly the same as in the DSM-IV. It's just changed the name of it from "pedophila" to "pedophiliac disorder." So how did the AFA go from that to waving its flags around?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31 October 2013, 11:50 PM
geminilee's Avatar
geminilee geminilee is offline
 
Join Date: 02 December 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 11,515
Default

I think it fulfills the definition of an orientation, in that it typically cannot be cured any more than homo- or heterosexuality.

Does that mean I think it is ok, should be legal, or any of that nonsense? Hell no. I would like to see some more understanding of the condition/orientation. That way, (to use a phrase I heard first from Dan Savage) " Gold Star" pedophiles can get the help and support they need to remain "Gold Stars".

I can imagine it must be difficult, to know that if you ever had a sexual relationship with one you are attracted to, you will damage them. That is totally not to belittle the very real suffering caused by the other type, and not to distract or detract from them.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01 November 2013, 01:47 AM
Avril's Avatar
Avril Avril is offline
 
Join Date: 07 August 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 10,504
Default

I'm not sure that whether or not something can be "cured" is what makes it a disorder. Lots of disorders can't be cured.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01 November 2013, 06:43 AM
ichabodius ichabodius is offline
 
 
Join Date: 05 November 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 57
Default

Posted this elsewhere:
Heres a detailed explanation of the changes made earlier this year:

http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.or...icleid=1685438

Quote:
Most apparent to clinicians will be the distinction between paraphilias—defined as atypical sexual practices—and paraphilic disorders, which include distress or impairment in functioning. Specific criteria for paraphilic disorders are not changed except for the addition of specifiers for “in remission” or “in a controlled environment” to indicate course of illness; the latter specifier would be used, for instance, in the case of someone with a pedophilic disorder who no longer engages in sexual activity with children because the individual is incarcerated.
Peophilia is still considered a paraphilic disorder it has not changed there have only been qualifiers added to indicate "in remission" or "in a controlled environment" i.e prison.

Pedophilia is not being normalized.
This will explain further:

http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Paraph...ct%20Sheet.pdf


Quote:
Characteristics of Paraphilic Disorders
Most people with atypical sexual interests do not have a mental disorder. To be diagnosed with a paraphilic
disorder, DSM-5 requires that people with these interests:
• feel personal distress about their interest, not merely distress resulting from society’s disapproval;
or
• have a sexual desire or behavior that involves another person’s psychological distress, injury, or
death, or a desire for sexual behaviors involving unwilling persons or persons unable to give legal
consent.
To further define the line between an atypical sexual interest and disorder, the Work Group revised the
names of these disorders to differentiate between the behavior itself and the disorder stemming from
that behavior (i.e., Sexual Masochism in DSM-IV will be titled Sexual Masochism Disorder in DSM-5).
It is a subtle but crucial difference that makes it possible for an individual to engage in consensual atypical
sexual behavior without inappropriately being labeled with a mental disorder. With this revision,
DSM-5 clearly distinguishes between atypical sexual interests and mental disorders involving these
desires or behaviors.
The chapter on paraphilic disorders includes eight conditions: exhibitionistic disorder, fetishistic disorder,
frotteuristic disorder, pedophilic disorder, sexual masochism disorder, sexual sadism disorder,
transvestic disorder, and voyeuristic disorder.
Please note this:
Quote:
In the case of pedophilic disorder, the notable detail is what wasn’t revised in the new manual. Although
proposals were discussed throughout the DSM-5 development process, diagnostic criteria ultimately
remained the same as in DSM-IV TR. Only the disorder name will be changed from pedophilia
to pedophilic disorder to maintain consistency with the chapter’s other listings.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05 November 2013, 09:19 PM
electricitycat's Avatar
electricitycat electricitycat is offline
 
Join Date: 11 February 2012
Location: Watford, UK
Posts: 64
Default

I don't think it should be 'normalised' in the sense that is considered acceptable to act upon those impulses, but we can't pretend that paedophilia is not an inherent condition and needs to be treated or managed in whatever way keeps the person and any potential victims of abuse safe.

I'm tired of seeing "PAEDOPHILE CAUGHT" when what they mean is child molester. I can only imagine how many people have those feelings and fight it every day and never act on it, they do not deserve to be tarred with the same brush. Max Pemberton who is an NHS psychiatrist mentioned working in a children's home and meeting a 12 year old boy who had tried to commit suicide on more than one occasion because he wanted to have sex with, and kill, small children, and he didn't want those thoughts in his head anymore.

I can't find a reference to that online, I think it was in one of his books, but here is an article he wrote on the subject of paedophilia in general:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10...e-illness.html
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08 November 2013, 01:24 AM
Blatherskite's Avatar
Blatherskite Blatherskite is offline
 
Join Date: 06 February 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,909
Default

In my opinion the argument whether a sexual inclination can be called a 'disorder' is a red herring waved about to distract us from the most critical issue of whether it's consensual or not. Certain kinds of people class homosexuality, bisexuality and asexuality as 'disorders' to de-normalise them and to ignore the total lack of harm they cause to either the 'sufferer' or their 'targets'. If a disorder causes no suffering other than what is inflicted by the negative response of society, is it really a disorder? It seems to me that the only people who suggest paedophilia is not a disorder are either remorseless paedophiles themselves or those who seek to tarnish the word 'orientation' by stroking paedophiles with the same brush. It is a demonstrably harmful act, so the desire to perform it is disordered.

I have a great deal of sympathy for paedophiles who seek help to stop themselves acting on their desires towards children who are by nature unable to give meaningful consent. But they are in no way comparable towards homosexuals, even reluctant homosexuals, who seek relationships with consenting adults.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08 November 2013, 04:57 AM
Esprise Me's Avatar
Esprise Me Esprise Me is offline
 
Join Date: 02 October 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,498
Default

This story has gotten me thinking--if we can create such convincing child porn bait for the purpose of catching predators without any actual children being involved, is it perhaps time to make that technology available to pedophiles who are looking for ethical ways to cope with their desires?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09 December 2013, 07:28 AM
Shoggoth Shoggoth is offline
 
 
Join Date: 04 May 2013
Location: Reynoldsburg, OH
Posts: 16
Default

No. Anything realistic enough to provide an outlet would be considered promoting the real thing. Even non-realistic things can get someone in trouble with obscenity laws.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eating Disorder Orthorexia on the Rise A Turtle Named Mack The Doctor Is In 5 22 January 2016 04:52 PM
What Can Be Done About Pedophilia? A Turtle Named Mack The Doctor Is In 9 28 August 2013 04:10 PM
Asexuality should be recognized as a legit Sexual Orientation Venus Social Studies 9 16 April 2013 02:10 PM
Research suggests pedophilia is intrinsic snopes The Doctor Is In 1 15 January 2013 09:34 PM
Another unusual brain disorder - synesthesia Buckle Up Science 21 15 January 2008 03:36 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.