snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > SLC Central > SLC

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #901  
Old 17 May 2018, 07:53 PM
Brad from Georgia's Avatar
Brad from Georgia Brad from Georgia is offline
 
Join Date: 21 June 2000
Location: Snellvile, GA
Posts: 13,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildaBeast View Post
Stupid question: If I take two standard tea bags and put one in 8 ounces of water and the other in 12 ounces of water, assuming all other variables are equal (water temperature, steeping time, etc.), will both cups contain the same total amount of caffeine with the larger one just being more diluted than the smaller one?
The difference won't be very great. If it's steeped to the taste you like, the small cup will have 36 mg, more or less, and the 12-ounce one will have 40 mg, more or less--not enough really to affect you. An eight-ounce cup of coffee usually has about 150 mg of caffeine. My cup is a sixteen-ounce version because I get up at five AM, and I need it.
Reply With Quote
  #902  
Old 17 May 2018, 08:16 PM
Darth Credence's Avatar
Darth Credence Darth Credence is offline
 
Join Date: 28 October 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenYus234 View Post
Presumably there was something above it, otherwise they could have just flown right at it instead of having to make the trench run.
The canon explanation for why they go down the trench is to avoid the turbolasers on the surface. The trench provides cover as they line up the shot.

Now, why in the world they are able to get to the trench without being destroyed is never really covered that I know of. The beginning of the attack, before anyone makes an actual trench run, is all about clearing out the guns in the area to go in. If they did that any way, you would think they could have done it at the exhaust port. But I've long since learned that the more you think about the movies, the more they fall apart, so I just watch and enjoy.
Reply With Quote
  #903  
Old 17 May 2018, 09:08 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is offline
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 25,422
Default

IMO, the real reason they made the trench run to hit the target is because that's how WWII aircraft would attack their targets. Fighter aircraft making strafing or rocket attacks on trains or other similar targets would have to fly a straight course so the bullets or rockets would have a chance of hitting their targets. Heavy bombers like the B-17 or B-29 were even more locked into a fixed path, they had to maintain the same altitude, direction, and airspeed so their bombardiers could use their bombsights with some degree of accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #904  
Old 17 May 2018, 09:13 PM
RichardM RichardM is offline
 
Join Date: 27 March 2004
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 4,180
Default

The reason the fighters in Star Wars dive into the trench to make their attack is because the director said so.
Reply With Quote
  #905  
Old 18 May 2018, 01:54 AM
Meka Meka is offline
 
Join Date: 20 December 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenYus234 View Post
IMO, the real reason they made the trench run to hit the target is because that's how WWII aircraft would attack their targets. Fighter aircraft making strafing or rocket attacks on trains or other similar targets would have to fly a straight course so the bullets or rockets would have a chance of hitting their targets. Heavy bombers like the B-17 or B-29 were even more locked into a fixed path, they had to maintain the same altitude, direction, and airspeed so their bombardiers could use their bombsights with some degree of accuracy.
The trench run sequence was based on a number of World War II movies, in particular The Dam Busters* and to a lesser extent 633 Squadron. Both of these films featured as their climactic sequences extremely low level attacks requiring pinpoint accuracy. This link has a side-by-side comparison of Dam Busters and Star Wars shots.

* And the actual raid that inspired the film.
Reply With Quote
  #906  
Old 18 May 2018, 05:42 AM
Don Enrico's Avatar
Don Enrico Don Enrico is offline
 
Join Date: 05 October 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 7,529
Default

That was great, Meka! I didn't expect it to be that much a rip-off of (or should I say: hommage to) The Dambusters!
Reply With Quote
  #907  
Old 18 May 2018, 01:24 PM
ChasFink's Avatar
ChasFink ChasFink is offline
 
Join Date: 09 December 2015
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 600
Fight

I haven't seen such a ripoff since Cripple Fight ripped off They Live.
Reply With Quote
  #908  
Old 18 May 2018, 01:30 PM
iskinner's Avatar
iskinner iskinner is online now
 
Join Date: 06 May 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Credence View Post
Now, why in the world they are able to get to the trench without being destroyed is never really covered that I know of.
There is one line in the movie when the plan of attack is being discussed that I paraphrase here that the Death Star defenses where not designed for small craft, otherwise there would have been a lot more point defense installations.

So basically in a cost cutting measure they did not feel the need to provide enough turbo laser towers to repel a fighter attack. Probably under the impression that such craft would not have heavy enough weapons to seriously damage their super weapon and thus where not a true threat. At least that is my interpretation of script choices to back fill a logical explanation.
Reply With Quote
  #909  
Old 18 May 2018, 02:49 PM
TallGeekyGirl's Avatar
TallGeekyGirl TallGeekyGirl is offline
 
Join Date: 31 December 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 12,115
Default

"The Death Star's defenses are built around a direct, large-scale assault. A small, one-man fighter should be able to penetrate the outer defense."
--Gen. Jan Dodonna

Also...

"We count 30 Rebel ships, Lord Vader, but they're so small they're avoiding our turbolasers."
--Imperial gunnery officer (I'm sure the original EU had a name for him as well as a fully fleshed-out history detailed in a series of novels by different authors with conflicting information, but I can't be arsed to look it up right now...)
Reply With Quote
  #910  
Old 21 May 2018, 02:31 AM
Mouse's Avatar
Mouse Mouse is offline
 
Join Date: 10 July 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,162
Mouse

All right, British Snopesters, maybe you can clear up a longstanding question Iíve had:

Is my theory about Prince Charles being the Ralph Wiggum of the royal family true?
Reply With Quote
  #911  
Old 21 May 2018, 07:00 AM
lord_feldon's Avatar
lord_feldon lord_feldon is offline
 
Join Date: 08 August 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,383
Default

That's his brother Andrew.

Quote:
What sort of ideas, his pitiless interviewer follows up. Long silence. “Trying to think now …” Aide whispers in ear. Duke perks up — and boasts that he was the fearless lateral thinker who relaxed the ban on mobile phones in the Palace and is even now planning to upgrade the wi-fi.
(Literally LOLing now that I'm hearing "I'm an ideas factory" in Ralph's voice.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid questions WildaBeast SLC 1005 08 October 2015 04:34 AM
Stupid questions Mr. Billion SLC 1039 04 June 2015 06:24 AM
Stupid questions JoeBentley SLC 999 28 November 2013 10:52 PM
Stupid questions DawnStorm SLC 1002 25 July 2013 05:38 PM
Stupid pet questions CenTex Wild Kingdom 46 11 June 2013 02:01 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.