snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Non-UL Chat > Techno-Babble

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04 September 2015, 09:17 AM
Andrew of Ware's Avatar
Andrew of Ware Andrew of Ware is offline
 
Join Date: 22 April 2003
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 8,017
Default

They have erected adjustable screens over the top floor windows to deflect the sunlight.

In addition 2013 was a hot and sunny summer. This year in the UK summer was 15th June.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04 September 2015, 09:48 AM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kallah View Post
And sometimes we refuse to even do that without a fight! Willis Tower was, for most of existence, named the Sears Tower.
We're not completely immune to such things - although one example I can think of also involves Willis... they seem to like having buildings named after them. Norman Foster's first building is in Ipswich - the Willis Building. When I moved there it was the Willis Corroon building, so I still automatically call it that. Apparently it started as the Willis, Faber and Dumas HQ building. Willis is the common factor, though - looks like they've owned it all along.

The old Post Office Tower, from which I took the photo above, is currently the BT Tower. And the old Nat West Tower, which is the building just in front and to the left of the Gherkin in that photo, is now Tower 42.

Both the Post Office Tower and the Nat West Tower had their turn as the tallest building in the UK.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04 September 2015, 02:19 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is offline
 
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 26,100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildaBeast View Post
I thought we named our buildings after whoever is willing to pay the most for the naming rights.
Isn't that mostly sports arenas? I was thinking more of skyscrapers.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05 September 2015, 09:30 PM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is offline
 
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,202
Default

There's an interesting discussion here about whether the Walkie Talkie should be demolished - hypothetically, of course; it's not going to be demolished any time soon. But it seems pretty much everybody hates it. Even the guy defending it in the conversation - the director of the Design Museum in London - doesn't like it; he's just trying to guard against hyperbole...

http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...emolish-debate

I've seen the Palace of Culture in Warsaw and it is indeed even uglier, but in a much more striking way... the Walkie Talkie manages to be both boring and ugly, to me. (Although I still think the Cheesegrater is as bad if not worse). I thought Jonathan Jones had some interesting points, for once, about these things happening because nobody wants to sound like Prince Charles, even though the other guy skewered him by pointing out that Charles would have been against building it in the first place, and would have been right.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona Jaguar Versus Copper Mine BrianB Wild Kingdom 1 01 July 2013 07:53 PM
Here Are the Non-conforming Parts As Requested llewtrah Business 0 27 January 2011 11:14 AM
Human Parts Processing Factory (gruesome) Jenn Fauxtography 17 03 August 2009 01:04 AM
Frog parts in guacamole Guineh Food 20 16 August 2007 07:01 PM
Sewing machine parts for cycle engines snopes Automobiles 1 04 August 2007 05:08 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.