Go Back > SLC Central > Soapbox Derby

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 June 2018, 05:37 PM
Kermor Kermor is offline
Join Date: 22 June 2012
Location: Bois d'Arcy, France
Posts: 412
Bang Head "Upskirting bill" blocked by one MP in the UK

A bill to make upskirting a specific criminal offence punishable by up to two years in prison has been blocked in the House of Commons after a single Conservative MP objected to it.

The voyeurism (offences) bill on upskirting – the taking of surreptitious, sexually intrusive images – was put forward by the Liberal Democrat MP Wera Hobhouse after a campaign by Gina Martin. Police have declined to prosecute a man Martin accused of taking underskirt pictures of her on his phone at a music festival in London last summer.

As a private member’s bill it would normally have little chance of becoming law. But early on Friday the justice minister Lucy Frazer said the government would back it.

However, when the deputy speaker Lindsay Hoyle read out the name of the bill later that day, the Tory MP Christopher Chope shouted: “Object”. Without sufficient time in the session for a proper vote it was sent back for another try on 6 July.

The MP for Christchurch also used the Commons session to delay another government-backed bill, which would make it an offence to attack police dogs or horses, or prison officer dogs.

When even your own party shouts "Shame !" at you, maybe you should consider retirement, you worthless piece of manure.

Last edited by Kermor; 16 June 2018 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2018, 02:44 PM
UEL's Avatar
UEL UEL is offline
Join Date: 01 August 2004
Location: Fredericton, Canada
Posts: 9,385

We had a similar situation in Canada a few years ago where one politician would object vociferously to any legislation put forth by one committee because he considered the head of that committee to be a fraud of a politician.

I could understand it if the politician who objected did so because he thought the legislation did not go far enough, went too far, or had some area of concern or error. But in this case, it looks like it was more a case of him wanting to disrupt the legislative process.
Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2018, 04:10 PM
Sultana of Beetroot's Avatar
Sultana of Beetroot Sultana of Beetroot is offline
Join Date: 30 November 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 210

Backbencher Christopher Chope says he backs bill but objected for procedural reasons
Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2018, 04:33 PM
Richard W's Avatar
Richard W Richard W is online now
Join Date: 19 February 2000
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 26,441

Yes, there's an opinion piece here from somebody who's encountered him before, and basically he does this all the time on all sorts of bills just to be difficult (or "stand up for Parliamentary scrutiny" as he apparently puts it). He's just never managed to annoy quite as many people at once with it before:

Chope will no doubt lean on this defence to explain why he objected to a bill that would have made sexual offenders of perverts who instead of calling their mothers are using their iPhones as their only chance of ever seeing a vagina. He will exclaim that the bill needed more scrutiny. I dare say he will claim he fully supports the bill. I call bullshit on that. He doesn’t care less about women who have suffered this indignity.

I was part of a group of MPs who tried to put forward a bill that would have allowed mothers’ names to be listed on marriage certificates. The Tory MP who was taking the bill through parliament sheepishly approached me and said it wasn’t going to pass because he’d had a chat with Chope who didn’t like the bill because of something some vicar in his constituency had said to him. So our old friend Chope and no doubt an imaginary vicar trumped a nation of mothers. That was that. I searched for him in the corridors of Westminster that day in order to give him a bollocking, but couldn’t find him – it wasn’t a Friday and I can’t say I have ever noticed him doing anything but wrecking bills.
Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2019, 07:59 PM
Kermor Kermor is offline
Join Date: 22 June 2012
Location: Bois d'Arcy, France
Posts: 412

You know, when I heard about the upskirting bill blocking, I wanted to slap him. When I heard that he had similarly blocked a bill which would make an offence to stab police dogs and horses, I wanted to kick his a**e. Now, I just want to strangle him :

Demands for Conservative MP Christopher Chope to be kicked out of the party were mounting last night as colleagues and campaigners voiced their anger over his move to block a law protecting girls from female genital mutilation (FGM).

Chope, who gained infamy after previously halting a bill to make upskirting a criminal offence, blocked a planned law protecting children from FGM by shouting “object!” when the bill was presented on Friday to the Commons for its second reading.
The sooner that piece of s**t is gone, the better.
Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2019, 10:06 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust thorny locust is offline
Join Date: 27 April 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 9,901

Did they eventually manage to get the other two bills through?
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
School worksheet quizzed students on "boy toy," "trophy wife" and affairs Psihala NFBSK Gone Wild! 5 16 November 2017 01:30 PM
Bill Clinton: I "support" Obamacare Psihala Soapbox Derby 12 08 October 2016 07:39 AM
Yes, Bill Murray's Baloo will sing "The Bear Necessities" she-geek Amusement Bark 13 29 December 2014 06:32 PM
"Password" unseated by "123456" on SplashData's annual "Worst Passwords" list snopes Techno-Babble 32 04 February 2014 12:42 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.