Go Back > Non-UL Chat > Police Blotter

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 September 2017, 07:15 PM
E. Q. Taft's Avatar
E. Q. Taft E. Q. Taft is offline
Join Date: 30 July 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 13,697

...although that particular phrase never made any sense to me, either. I mean, isn't it pretty natural to want to eat a cake if you have one? What else can you do with a cake, except maybe jump out of it if you're a stripper?

(Yeah, I stole that line. Sue me, Yahtzee!)
Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:19 PM
erwins's Avatar
erwins erwins is offline
Join Date: 04 April 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,562

But once you eat the cake, you no longer have it.
Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:19 PM
GenYus234's Avatar
GenYus234 GenYus234 is offline
Join Date: 02 August 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 24,768

I think it has become flipped and should really be, "You want to eat your cake and have it too." IE, you want to be able to eat your cake but still have an entire uneaten cake. Same flipping may have happened to the phrase, "head over heels". That's how most people are most of the time, it isn't some topsy turvey condition like is is used.
Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 01:17 AM
mbravo's Avatar
mbravo mbravo is offline
Join Date: 29 December 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 999

Maybe I'll try to start "head under heels" as a thing that is said.
Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 03:44 AM
Esprise Me's Avatar
Esprise Me Esprise Me is offline
Join Date: 02 October 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,557

Originally Posted by Lainie View Post
IANAL, and I'll be interested in hearing Esprise Me's response. But criminal and civil courts serve different purposes, and although some crimes may result in a civil suit, AIUI that's the exception: most civil cases don't involve anything that could be prosecuted as a crime.
This is correct, as are the other responses that came after.

It's a little difficult for me to answer the "why" question because it's always made such intuitive sense to me that it's hard to see where the disconnect is for others. If two people claim ownership of something (money, goods, something more abstract), you have to pick a winner, so you pick the person with the better claim, even if their claim isn't that much better. That's civil court. If someone has maybe done something really wrong, something society has an interest in discouraging, society may punish that person, even though doing so may not provide restitution to the victims. But if you're going to punish someone by depriving them of life or liberty, you need to be damn sure you've got the right guy.

Put another way: if someone offered me a lottery ticket with a one in six chance of losing my life savings but a five in six chance of winning all the money I could ever want, I'd think long and hard about that. But offer me a game of Russian roulette, where the one in six chance means literal death, and even if the five in six chance meant, say, vengeance upon everyone who's ever wronged me or anyone I love, and I wouldn't even consider it. Would you?
Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 01:28 PM
Psihala's Avatar
Psihala Psihala is offline
Join Date: 28 February 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 7,624
Tsk, Tsk Judge Rules Joe Arpaio’s Pardon by Trump Erases His Punishment, Not His Crime

The judge in former Sheriff Joe Arpaio's now-pardoned criminal case has refused the retired lawman's request to throw out all rulings in the case, including a blistering decision that explained her reasoning in finding him guilty of a crime.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal judge strikes down gay-marriage ban in Alabama snopes Moot Court 18 01 October 2016 12:00 AM
Federal Judge Strikes Down Texas Gay Marriage Ban CenTex Soapbox Derby 0 26 February 2014 08:14 PM
Judge rules against 'America's toughest sheriff' in racial profiling lawsuit Amigone201 Moot Court 5 26 May 2013 03:49 AM
Judge holds self in contempt for his smartphone Psihala Moot Court 9 20 April 2013 03:39 PM
Federal judge who sent racist Obama email says he will retire snopes Soapbox Derby 0 04 April 2013 04:40 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.