![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ACLU equest asked for two memos that outline how the FBI interprets the Supreme Court decision blocking law enforcement from using GPS to track a suspect’s car without a warrant.
As the ACLU reported, the organization has just received a response — almost all of it blacked out. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...214357663.html |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It says right on it that it's attorney work product of the Department of Justice, which is what one would expect when asking how the FBI interprets a legal decision. The FBI would have asked their lawyers, who happen to be the DOJ, how the law should be interpreted. The advice they received would be privileged as attorney/client advice, and therefore not subject to release under FOIA. It's pretty disingenuous of the ACLU (of which I'm a fan, normally) to pretend otherwise.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
My goodness - the comments section is a myriad of stupidity. Actually in all of the contents only 2 posts actually are bringing up the fact that legal interpretation would be covered by attorney client privilege - the kind of stuff that a FOI would deny. It takes a court order to compel such communication and I can't imagine a lawyer fighting tooth and nail to oppose such a ruling if it ever came up (which I doubt has happened) and they might even face contempt since they would refuse such an order.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Prayer request: Avi Ben Stella | snopes | Inboxer Rebellion | 2 | 25 August 2009 10:24 PM |
| Prayer request: Sam Bish | snopes | Inboxer Rebellion | 4 | 23 August 2009 01:25 AM |
| Prayer Request for 11-year-old boy | snopes | Inboxer Rebellion | 1 | 13 February 2008 11:17 PM |
| Zoo always gets this big request | snopes | Medical | 9 | 05 September 2007 12:34 PM |