![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is pretty much correct. I refuse to donate to SA because of their bigoted stance in regards to GLBTQ persons.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I thought their stance on the issue was widely known enough that it wouldn't need this sort of confirmation.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't donate to them, and tell others why whenever I get the chance. I'm not sure though that they spend donations on lobbying, and it's certainly up for debate whether or not they are a "charity." They may not meet my subjective definition of what I think charities ought to be about, but since there's a legal definition they have to meet I think it's probably at least a bit misleading to state flat out that they "are NOT a charity."
So although I heartily agree with the general sentiments, I'd put a couple of [citation needed] tags on the flyer. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
And, I'd add 'in USA'.
The mission statement (and practice) of the Salvation Army in New Zealand is provide assistance without discrimination There are still religion based barriers to positions of leadership (which may be discriminatory, though they are currently based around 'married or celibate, no matter which genders) but in terms of Joe Average asking for assistance? you can sleep with whomever you wish, and it will make no difference whatsoever. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is that supposed to be "actively oppose gay rights", rather than "oppress"?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Given the overall effect, oppress seems to be a fairly accurate term.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
How does one "oppress" a right?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Salvation Army OPPOSES "LGBT" legislation because such laws conflict with a person's conscience since "gay" not only refers to someone who experiences same-sex physical attraction but also engages in sexual acts with someone of the same sex. The Salvation Army views such behavior as immoral and contrary to what God intends. They are not bigots for this reason. Certainly not like racists! It's a matter of sexual morality. So please don't call them bigoted!
Barb Rainey |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
[hijack]Bar Brainey is a sillier parsing of your user name.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Right. Just like those racists who say "I don't dislike people for being black, just acting black."
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm sure the Salvation Army would be the first to defend any anti-Christian messages as not being bigoted because the person is only opposing those people that choose to act on their Christian feelings.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
The root of their bigotry is irrelevant. They believe that a segment of the population is lesser than they are, is deserving of fewer rights, of fewer legal protections, and in fact a spokesperson says that "gays should be put to death."
That is bigotry. They are bigots. Period. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet another reason to give them the finger when they ask for a dollar.
When I was in trouble and needed help, they seemed more interested in finding out which church I belonged to. I didn't belong to any church. So, when I got back on my feet and had a dollar to give away around Christmas, it didn't go into the SA kettle. I gave it to a homeless diabetic instead. (I found out he was diabetic when I offered him the bottle of Coke I had with me and he said "No thanks, I'm diabetic.") |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Definition of BIGOT : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance Yes, it is bigotry. What difference does it make to you? You are following the life that you believe will result in a favorable place for you with your God. What can these people possibly be doing to affect your ending? I honestly want to know what difference it makes to you. If they are living in what you perceive to be sin, quite frankly it's none of your damn business. It's between them and "God". |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Major Andrew Craib, spokesman for the Salvation Army, recently stated that the Salvation Army's position on homosexuality is that all gays should die. After the expected backlash, the Salvos issued a statement of retraction. Sort of.
[cite] |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Stock Answer 2: If their nation makes it legal it's like them saying it's 'ok' (in fairness I've heard anti-Death Penalty people use this argument as well) Stock Answer 3: It's important to try to reduce the amount of 'sin' out there. Real Answer 1: Cause we hate gay people but just out and out 'hating' people is hard to sell and doesn't come with the special protection that 'It's my religion!" does. Real Answer 2: It's icky Real Answer 3: Inward homosexual feelings need to be repressed so they are even more hostile outward to make sure to send the message that 'they ain't gay'. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Wheedling 'please don't call them what they actually are!' is quite rich. Why should they be afforded an ounce of consideration from those of us they don't count as full human beings? They can damn well own it, along with all the opprobium that'll earn them from us conscience-confusing LGBT types and our allies. They can take it. God's on their side, after all. But this looks like one of those occasions when it's worse to call someone a bigot than it is to actually act like one. Btw, why the scare quotes around LGBT? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are there really scissors on top of Army flagpoles? | snopes | Military | 8 | 25 October 2010 08:36 PM |
| Army doesn't supply socks | snopes | Military | 35 | 16 May 2010 07:57 PM |
| U.S. Army canteen in Iraq | Suki | Fauxtography | 57 | 30 August 2008 01:52 PM |
| Life in the Australian Army... | Floater | Humor | 18 | 29 March 2007 07:46 AM |