snopes.com  

Go Back   snopes.com > Urban Legends > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27 January 2012, 02:31 AM
snopes's Avatar
snopes snopes is offline
 
Join Date: 18 February 2000
Location: California
Posts: 104,906
Soapbox The Obama Economic Record

Comment: Could you please tell me the accuracy of this chart?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27 January 2012, 02:40 AM
wanderwoman's Avatar
wanderwoman wanderwoman is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2004
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,714
Default

Just at first glance, a rise in unemployment rate from 7.8% to 8.5% is an increase of .7%, not 9%.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27 January 2012, 02:48 AM
Dropbear's Avatar
Dropbear Dropbear is offline
 
Join Date: 03 June 2005
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 6,924
Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderwoman View Post
Just at first glance, a rise in unemployment rate from 7.8% to 8.5% is an increase of .7%, not 9%.
It would roughly be a 9% increase - which would be equal to .7%.

Dropbear
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27 January 2012, 02:56 AM
Mickey Blue's Avatar
Mickey Blue Mickey Blue is online now
 
Join Date: 01 February 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 16,262
Default

I have no idea if its accurate or not but considering Bush and Co. threw us into a major depression due to their policymaking while engaging us in two expensive wars its not unexpected that the effort of digging us out (all the while with conservatives fighting him at every turn) may take a while and result us being worse off economically than we were at the beginning of the Bush/Republican caused recession.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27 January 2012, 03:35 AM
rockland6674's Avatar
rockland6674 rockland6674 is offline
 
Join Date: 28 December 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,764
Icon106

When I tried to play The Obama Economic Record, it sounded scratchy and unmusical. Maybe I need a new needle?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27 January 2012, 03:43 AM
wanderwoman's Avatar
wanderwoman wanderwoman is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2004
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropbear View Post
It would roughly be a 9% increase - which would be equal to .7%.

Dropbear
Ok, 'splain it to me. The straight percentage is .7%. How is it right to take a percentage of the percentage? Not being snarky or anything.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27 January 2012, 04:10 AM
ganzfeld's Avatar
ganzfeld ganzfeld is offline
 
Join Date: 05 September 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 15,898
Default

It makes a bit more sense if you look at unemployment as a number (for example number of unemployed) rather than a percentage. But it's not a good criticism of Obama. Unemployment was on a steep rise for all of 2008 (an increase of several hundred percents if you go by this method!). That rise stopped and began to fall during his first year in office. It's down from a high of just over 10% (at the end of 2009).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27 January 2012, 04:19 AM
wanderwoman's Avatar
wanderwoman wanderwoman is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2004
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,714
Default

I guess I'm just math-challenged, then. Are we looking at it as a percentage change of the percentage change?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27 January 2012, 06:42 AM
Don Enrico's Avatar
Don Enrico Don Enrico is offline
 
Join Date: 05 October 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 6,092
Teacher

Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderwoman View Post
Just at first glance, a rise in unemployment rate from 7.8% to 8.5% is an increase of .7%, not 9%.
The unemployment rate has risen by .7 percentage points, which is 9% of what it was before (7.8% of the employable population).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27 January 2012, 12:00 PM
damian's Avatar
damian damian is offline
 
Join Date: 14 April 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,236
Default

The chart does not include:
- the number of Osama Bin Ladens alive on Inauguration Day (1) compared with today (0).
- the number of wars the US is engaged in on Inauguration Day (2) compared with today (1).
- the number of Wall St investment bankers that have faced charges over their actions that led to the Global Financial Crisis on Inauguration Day (0) compared with today (0).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28 January 2012, 09:41 PM
jimmy101_again jimmy101_again is offline
 
Join Date: 29 December 2005
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 4,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by damian View Post
The chart does not include:
- the number of Osama Bin Ladens alive on Inauguration Day (1) compared with today (0).
- the number of wars the US is engaged in on Inauguration Day (2) compared with today (1).
- the number of Wall St investment bankers that have faced charges over their actions that led to the Global Financial Crisis on Inauguration Day (0) compared with today (0).
- Average number of US citizens killed per year by terrorists under Bush (~1,200) compared with Obama (~100).
- Average number of US buildings hit by hijacked planes under Bush (3) compared with Obama (0).
- Number of conservatives on the edge of an apoplectic fit under Bush (none) compared with Obama (millions).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Email Claims to Have Solution to Economic Crisis snopes Snopes Spotting 3 12 January 2010 11:55 PM
Men’s Underwear as an Economic Indicator snopes Business 3 19 October 2009 11:58 PM
Scams don’t stop in bad economic times snopes Crime 4 02 November 2008 02:36 AM
Economic stimulus rumors snopes Business 4 09 February 2008 06:56 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.